Kevin Grandia: Keystone XL pipeline means fewer jobs than they say

    1 of 1 2 of 1

      The core talking points for the supporters of TransCanada's Keystone XL pipeline center around U.S. domestic energy security and economic growth. However, Keystone is an "export pipeline" that will take tar sands oil from Alberta and pump it down to a tax-free zone in Texas and out to foreign markets.

      In other words, the EU, China, and Latin America get the oil, the foreign-owned oil companies get the cash and North Americans get a few jobs and oil spills!

      It's a complicated issue for sure, so I've tried to break out the main points in an infographic. Please feel free to download and share it, use it and tear it apart! All the information has been fact-checked and verified by energy policy experts.

      Here is the high-resolution version for download.

      Taking into account the fundamental data from the U.S. and global oil markets, the end location of the Keystone XL, the infrastructure being built at refineries processing the bitumen, and the commitment of oil companies to selling their product for the best price, it is easy to see Keystone XL offers greater energy security and economic growth, just not in America.

      Europe and Latin America will have more energy security thanks to a massive fuel pipeline they can tap as long as they're willing to pay.

      Additionally, oil companies will have a new bounty of profit to play with. Yes, some of that will fall back into American hands, but not as much as it would if the majority of the products to be processed in Port Arthur were sold in America, or if the refineries were not located in a Foreign Trade Zone and had to pay a tax on their products.

      As for the promise of new jobs, there is a short-term influx on cash for constructing the pipeline, but the latest estimates find that there will only be about 35 permanent jobs over the long term. These pipelines, once built demand very little maintenance. That is, of course, until there is an oil spill.

      In making the final decision on whether to approve the Keystone XL pipeline, it comes down to whether President Obama is comfortable with making more cash for foreign oil companies that are already the most wealthy companies in the world, for the long-term pay off of 35 permanent jobs and the oil spills that will inevitably occur.

      Seems like a no-brainer to me.

      Comments

      3 Comments

      Hazlit

      Jun 20, 2013 at 2:52pm

      Grammar error. If you're going to write for a newspaper at least learn the difference between "less" and "fewer."

      Uncle Jack

      Jun 20, 2013 at 11:55pm

      While the writers might be correct, it would be exoected to have some proof of the "about 35 jobs" mentioned in the article.

      Without any data, is not even worth the time reading it!

      Journalism means facts, not propaganda!!