David Suzuki: It's time to end the grizzly bear trophy hunt

    1 of 1 2 of 1

      Watching grizzly bears catch and eat salmon as they swim upstream to spawn is an unforgettable experience. Many people love to view the wild drama. Some record it with photos or video. But a few want to kill the iconic animals—not to eat, just to put their heads on a wall or coats on a floor.

      The spring grizzly kill starts April 1 and extends for several weeks, followed by a second fall season. By year’s end, several hundred will have died at the hands of humans, close to 90 percent shot by trophy hunters—many of them foreign licence-holders, as the B.C. government plans to enact new regulations to allow hunters from outside B.C. to take 40 percent of grizzlies slated for killing. The government also plans to allow foreign interests and corporations to buy and run guide-outfitting territories previously run only by B.C. residents. Local hunting organizations say the new rules put them at a disadvantage.

      According to the Vancouver Observer, hunting guide associations donated $84,800 to B.C. political parties from 2005 to 2013, 84 percent to the B.C. Liberals.

      In the controversy over regulatory changes, we’ve lost touch with the fact that the grizzly trophy hunt is horrific, regardless of whether bears are killed by resident hunters or big-game hunters who pay thousands of dollars for the chance to kill a bear here—often because it’s illegal in their home countries.

      Grizzlies once roamed much of North America, from Mexico to the Yukon and from the West Coast through the prairies. Habitat loss and overhunting have since shrunk their range by more than half. In Canada, 16 subgroups are on the brink of extinction, including nine in south-central B.C. and Alberta’s entire grizzly population.

      Just how many bears reside in B.C. is in dispute. The government claims more than 15,000 grizzlies live here, but Raincoast Conservation Foundation science director Chris Darimont, a University of Victoria conservation biologist, puts the number closer to the government’s earlier estimate of 6,600—before it doubled that in 1990 based on a single study in southeastern B.C.’s Flathead area.

      According to a Maclean’s article, in 2000, the government “suppressed the work of one of its own biologists, Dionys de Leeuw, for suggesting the hunt was excessive and could be pushing the bears to extinction. De Leeuw was later suspended without pay for having pursued the line of inquiry.” The government then pursued a five-year legal battle with groups including Raincoast Conservation and Ecojustice to keep its grizzly kill data sealed.

      Allan Thornton, president of the British Environmental Investigation Agency, which has studied B.C. grizzly management since the late 1990s, is blunt about the government’s justification. “The British Columbia wildlife department does not use rigorous science,” he told the Vancouver Observer. In 2004, the European Union banned imports of all B.C. grizzly parts into member countries after its analysis found the hunt to be unsustainable.

      Even the economic case is shaky. Studies by the Centre for Responsible Travel and Raincoast Conservation conclude revenue from bear-viewing is far higher than revenue from grizzly hunting.

      Grizzly population health is an indicator of overall ecosystem health, and bears are important to functioning ecosystems. They help regulate prey such as deer and elk, maintain forest health by dispersing seeds and aerating soil as they dig for food, and fertilize coastal forests by dragging salmon carcasses into the woods. Hunting isn’t the only threat. Habitat loss, decreasing salmon runs, collisions with vehicles and other conflicts with humans also endanger grizzlies. Because they have low reproduction rates, they’re highly susceptible to population decline. Hunting is one threat we can easily control.

      According to polls, almost 90 per cent of B.C. residents oppose hunting grizzlies for trophies, including many Frist Nations and food hunters. Scientists say it’s unsustainable. The Coastal First Nations coalition has banned grizzly hunting in its territories, but the government doesn’t recognize the ban. The Raincoast Conservation Foundation has bought hunting licences in an attempt to reduce bear kills on the coast.

      Simply put, most British Columbians—and Canadians—are against the grizzly trophy hunt. It’s time for the government to listen to the majority rather than industry donors and ban this barbaric and unsustainable practice.

      Written with contributions from David Suzuki Foundation Senior Editor Ian Hanington. Learn more at www.davidsuzuki.org.

      Comments

      38 Comments

      Nomas

      Mar 10, 2015 at 5:34pm

      Absolutely for the hunt as long as the grizzlies get a say in the turnout of the game. No cowardly firearm behaviour allowed; strictly hand-to-paw combat between man and grizzly. The morgue will definitely stimulate the economy.

      Gerry Powell

      Mar 12, 2015 at 11:45am

      Should be stopped now, and never allowed again.

      stephen lemay

      Mar 12, 2015 at 11:47am

      I live in southeast B C. In the mountains.st.marys region.it would be a shame to lose our grizzlies and it might happen.they are even planning on building a huge resort in B C. Demolishing a known grizzly habitat.that is a true crime

      Hailey

      Mar 12, 2015 at 1:30pm

      Completely agree. Someone's life shouldn't be a trophy. Even a bear's.
      What about humane laws?
      Even hunting laws should be built around only what is necessary.
      Keep it clean keep it natural.

      Lorie Nicol

      Mar 12, 2015 at 5:46pm

      STOP IT NOW!!!

      Chris L

      Mar 12, 2015 at 5:57pm

      Even the economics favor stopping the hunt. There's waaay more money to be made through viewing rather than slaughtering these bears. Our current Provincial government is the most corrupt we have ever elected. From LNG to the bogus bear hunt, the special interests of a few backwards rednecks are - yet again - being put forward above the will of the people.

      TK

      Mar 12, 2015 at 6:24pm

      But what can we do to help?! Unless I missed it, the article elaborates the problem statement quite clearly but stops short of telling us how to affect this change in a meaningful manner... Is there a petition circulating from the David Suzuki Foundation?

      Rudra Chattopadhyay

      Mar 12, 2015 at 6:31pm

      Hunting a bear is not a trophy but a disgrace

      mike gassien

      Mar 12, 2015 at 7:17pm

      85000 over 8 years, what a joke. Let's get a well to do animal lover to put up 85k a year to protect these creatures......p.s. Suzuki could easily afford it himself, thanx for the updates and all the info Dave, been following you since I could read. Why don't you pick up the tab on this one and then we'll all be more likely to follow suit. ... And if a problem still remains then we' all know its not just some paltry liberal donations and try a new tact