Gwynne Dyer: Another civil war in Yemen

    1 of 1 2 of 1

      The last American troops have been pulled out of Yemen after al-Qaeda fighters stormed a city near their base last Friday (March 20). Houthi rebels who had already overrun most of the country have now entered Aden, the last stronghold of President Abdrabbuh Mansour Hadi. And on Wednesday (March 25) Hadi boarded a helicopter and departed for parts unknown. 

      The U.S. State Department spokesman put the best possible face on the withdrawal of American troops, saying that “due to the deteriorating security situation in Yemen, the US government has temporarily relocated its remaining personnel out of Yemen.” He even said that the U.S. continued to support the “political transition” in Yemen. But there is no “political transition.” There is a four-sided civil war (although one side is about to collapse). 

      Why would anybody be surprised? There has been no 25-year period since the 7th century AD when there was not a civil war of one sort or another in Yemen. (They are often many-sided wars, and the impression that it was less turbulent before the 7th century may just be due to poor record-keeping.) But this time it’s actually frightening the neighbours. 

      Yemen’s current turmoil started in 2011, when the dictator who had ruled the country for 33 years, President Ali Abdullah Saleh, was forced out by non-violent democratic protesters (and some tribal militias who backed them). Saleh’s deputy, Abdrabbuh Mansour Hadi, took over and even won an election in 2012, but he never managed to establish his authority over the deeply divided country.

      Hadi had the backing of the United States and most of the Arab Gulf states (including Yemen’s big northern neighbour, Saudi Arabia) because he was willing to fight the Islamist extremists who had seized much of southern and eastern Yemen. But his main preoccupation was actually the Houthis, a tribal militia based in largely Shia northern Yemen.

      Angry at the status that the north was being offered in a proposed new federal constitution, the Houthis came south in force and seized Sanaa last September. In February, after months of house arrest, Hadi fled to the southern port of Aden, his home town and Yemen’s second city, and declared that the capital instead. So the Houthis came south after him.

      Meanwhile Saleh, the former president, returned from exile and made an alliance with the Houthis—despite the fact that he had launched six major offensives against them back when he was president. That’s what radicalised the Houthis in the first place, but they needed some national figure on their side as they moved deeper into the south, and Saleh is at least a Shia. He will have to do. Clear so far? Good.

      The third contender for power is al-Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula (AQAP), whose forces are only a half-hour’s drive from Aden. As its fighters closed in on Aden last week, AQAP seized the town next to the airbase where the American forces were living, and Washington ordered its troops out. But the Houthis got into the city of Aden first, and it is not yet clear whether AQAP will try to take it from them.

      Finally, we mustn’t forget the fighters of ISIS (Islamic State), who announced their presence in the country last month. Their sole operation of note so far has been suicide attacks on two Shia mosques in Sanaa on Sunday that killed 137 people. But as Sunni fanatics in a country that is currently being overrun by its Shia minority, ISIS will not lack for recruits. So the war will continue with three sides: Hadi goes out, and ISIS comes in.

      In conventional terms, Yemen doesn’t matter much. It has a lot of people (25 million), but it is the poorest country in the Arab world. Its oil has almost run out, and its water is going fast. You could argue that its geographical position is “strategic”—at the entrance to the Red Sea, commanding the approach to the Suez Canal—but it’s hard to see any Yemeni government getting the kind of military forces it would need to close that waterway.

      What worries people is the possibility that the jihadis (either al-Qaeda or ISIS) could come out of this on top. They are certainly not there yet, but many Sunnis will see them as the best chance to break the hold of the Shias who, despite their internal quarrels, have collectively dominated the country for so long. In fact, al-Qaeda and ISIS are now the last organised Sunni forces facing the Houthis.

      Shias are only one-third of Yemen’s population and the resentment runs deep. The Houthi troops now occupy almost three-quarters of the country’s densely populated areas, but it would be an exaggeration to say that they actually control all that territory. They are spread very thinly, and if they start to lose they could be rolled up very quickly by the jihadis. 

      That could turn Yemen into a terrorist-ruled “Islamic State” with five times the population of the one that sprang into existence last July on both sides of the Syrian-Iraqi border.

      The odds are against it, but after that “July surprise” nobody is ruling it out.

      Gwynne Dyer is an independent journalist whose articles are published in 45 countries.

      Comments

      3 Comments

      P.Peto

      Mar 24, 2015 at 1:26pm

      What? Is he saying Yemen is no longer of any strategic importance to the Empire? Perhaps then it was only a good to give aspiring young American drone pilots a place to practice the art of long distance remote control killing? Where is the American interventionist creed [R2P] that within every enemy Alien is an American trying to get out and the job of their military is to destroy them in order to FREE them? Go Figure.

      I Chandler

      Mar 25, 2015 at 8:16am

      DYER: There has been no 25-year period since the 7th century AD when there was no a civil in Yemen....Yemen’s current turmoil started in 2011"
      "Shias are only one-third of Yemen’s population ..and occupy three-quarters of the country..."

      It's all so complicated! Maybe they should separate:
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yemeni_unification

      DYER: "ISIS will not lack for recruits."

      Or mercenaries? But will Harper send them more British school girls? The empire has plenty of death-row inmates to fight: http://truth-out.org/news/item/26509-did-we-really-create-isis:

      DYER: "If [ISIS] doesn’t qualify as a full fourth force yet, it soon will."

      Where does this certainty come from? Where will they get arms? Financing? Hmm...

      DYER: "What worries people is the possibility that the jihadis (either al-Qaeda or ISIS) could come out of this on top. "

      What people? Clinton? Blair? Blair's not worried - he's stepping down as a Middle East peace envoy after eight wonderful years.

      silly military adventurism

      Mar 29, 2015 at 2:35am

      Saleh ran an informal network of patronage with various tribesmen to hold Yemen's institutions together. When regional US allied states engineered his ouster his replacement they parachuted into power got the institutions but did not inherit the patronage so the country fell apart quickly. Saleh still has widespread support which is how he and the Houthis were able to retake the entire country.