Adriane Carr: There are smarter ways for Vancouver to grow

    1 of 1 2 of 1

      I am running for city council because Vancouver is at a crossroads and I believe I can help.

      Forty years ago, citizens stopped freeways into downtown and put Vancouver on the path of becoming the world’s most livable city. Today our challenge is how do we accommodate growth and get greener without compromising the livability we love.

      Recent growth has created escalating housing prices, traffic congestion and overly-dense development. I believe there are better ways to grow, be greener, and retain our livability.

      These are my top priorities.

      1. A sustainable, livable city

      In 2011 our Livable Region Plan was replaced by a new Regional Growth Strategy. We need to return to livability as our core planning goal. We need to make investment in community services a priority because they make our city livable for all. We need to push harder to phase out crude oil tanker traffic because just one spill would ruin our economy, sustainability, and livability.

      2. Affordable housing

      Vancouver should not be for “the privileged few...starting at $5 million” (a sign I walk by on my way to work). We are a wealthy enough city to be livable for all. Pragmatically, we won’t build our economy with talented, creative people if they can’t afford to live here.

      Recent EcoDensity and STIR (Short-Term Incentives for Rental Housing) programs aren’t delivering affordable housing. They’re creating social conflict. We need a smarter approach. Rental apartments used to be built when there were tax breaks to entice the investment. Vancouver needs to push hard to reinstate that tax policy, expand it to include tax breaks for ongoing maintenance of rental buildings, and entice developers to work within existing zoning and deliver more affordable housing through cost-reducing incentives like relaxed parking stall requirements where there’s good public transit.

      3. Smarter growth

      Smarter growth means denser, more complete, and walkable communities. I’ve found that people are willing to accept reasonable density increases if developments respect existing zoning bylaws and neighbourhood character. That is not too much to ask for. There is enough capacity in current zoning to accommodate projected growth over the next few decades without the need for high rises where they aren’t zoned and aren’t wanted. Smarter growth also means more public transit, bike network improvement, and more efficient sharing of roads, including some bike-free routes and bus lanes, to reduce roadway conflicts and congestion.

      I believe city council could use a new voice and a new approach that’s collaborative, creative, and sensible.

      Many people know me as the first Green party leader in televised leaders’ debates. You may not know that I was born in Vancouver and have lived and worked here for most of my life. I graduated with a master’s degree in urban geography from UBC and wrote my thesis on the role of community groups in nurturing community spirit and stopping inappropriate development in Kitsilano. Since 2007 I’ve lived with my husband in the West End near Stanley Park. I love this city.

      If you elect me to Vancouver city council, this is what you can expect: I will listen to people and work with everyone. In making decisions, I will always consider: will it help create a more sustainable local economy, a healthier environment, and a more affordable and livable city?

      I am committed to creating a better Vancouver for everyone. I will be the one Green Party of Vancouver candidate on your council ballot. I hope you give one of your 10 council votes to me.

      Adriane Carr is the Green Party of Vancouver’s candidate for city council.

      Comments

      21 Comments

      Lawson1945

      Oct 24, 2011 at 4:41pm

      That the problem with Vancouver there should be a freeway from Richmond to North Vancouver/West Vancouver so we can by pass Vancouver, you sure are having trouble getting wins at any level, why is this?

      RealityCheck

      Oct 24, 2011 at 5:22pm

      Old Ideas under a seriously discredited brand. How many times to the voters get to say NO to the old-left politics Carr espouses?

      Richard C.

      Oct 24, 2011 at 7:51pm

      Bike free streets? What are people that live, work or shop on these streets supposed to do? Drive? That is not very Green. What we really need is a Carr Free City Council. Vote Vision/COPE!

      Barb F.

      Oct 24, 2011 at 8:45pm

      Bike free streets? Do we need more government controls? Is she serious that this could be enforced? Being Green didn't work out for her and now she is trying a black suit and pearls to appeal to the business sector. Pretty transparent.

      hms

      Oct 24, 2011 at 8:47pm

      "Bike free streets" is the most thoughtless comment I've heard in a while - and from the Green Party! Cyclists pay taxes - why shouldn't they be allowed to ride on any street? I hope my street doesn't become "bike free". How would I get anywhere?

      My name

      Oct 24, 2011 at 8:58pm

      Bike free routes? What is the alternative mode for those streets? Cars? Not very "green" indeed! As stated, a Carr free city council seems to be the way to go! ;)

      GregEh

      Oct 24, 2011 at 9:04pm

      What's up with those unnaturally large teeth?

      BikerCK

      Oct 24, 2011 at 9:40pm

      I don't know if Carr is right or left, and frankly don't care. But when I read that she is willing to abrogate the right to public space based upon choice of transportation, without outlining which streets or the benefits such a decision would bring, it's impossible to support her candidacy. Frankly, it's a slap in the face of young people, the poor, and anyone who can't afford an expensive vehicle or the ongoing cost of bus fare.

      Khauner

      Oct 25, 2011 at 5:51am

      I have never heard of bike free routes. Most progressive thinking points exactly in the opposite direction. All over the world cities are trying to incorporate biking as a sustainable mode of transportation to alleviate problems created by developing around the use of cars. Here the Green party wants to discourage pollution-free biking so that cars can control the roads. Really?

      C. Van Ihinger

      Oct 25, 2011 at 10:09am

      We all support Ms Carr's green initiatives. She has invested her whole working career in successfully promoting and implementing some of the best green programmes in Western Canada. We look forward to her contributions on Vancouver's City Council.

      We do hope, however, that she will take a very close look at a couple of the concepts she proposes in her current platform:

      1) I'm sure the developers will embrace tax breaks and other perks for throwing up low rental housing. In particular, these same developers will love relaxed parking stall requirements. Trouble is, the developers will paint a lovely picture of close-enough-to-walk-to-everywhere, the housing will be built, then the Entitleds will move in and park their land barges on our roads, across our sidewalks and intruding into our bike lanes. Not sure this will happen? Take a look at the Lexuses (Lexi?) sprawled across our bike/walk lane just west of the entrance to Granville Island.

      2) Bike free routes? Most of us who pay our property taxes (either directly or through our rent cheques) will balk at the idea of surrendering our right to ride our bicycles on our city streets.