Friends of the Squamish Chief fights Sea to Sky Gondola

B.C. Parks recommends removing land from Stawamus Chief Provincial Park for project, company says

    1 of 2 2 of 2

      Opponents of a private-sector proposal to build a sightseeing gondola through Stawamus Chief Provincial Park in Squamish have formed an ad hoc group to fight the project.

      Friends of the Squamish Chief represents the revival of a similarly named group that came together to defeat a 2004 proposal to run a gondola to the top of the Stawamus Chief’s Second Peak.

      Anders Ourom, a member of the FOSC organizing committee, told the Georgia Straight that public pressure is the key to stopping Sea to Sky Gondola Corporation’s proposal to remove land from the Chief park for the latest project.

      “We’re simply getting out information and encouraging people to learn about it and say their bit to the politicians,” Ourom said by phone from his Vancouver home office. “Ultimately, there’s a significant political element to it, in terms of who makes the decisions. If they see that, yes, there’s quite a lot of people that actually are concerned about what’s happening and do want to say their bit, the politicians, I would hope, would take that into account.”

      Ourom sat on both the study team that recommended the creation of the Chief park and the citizens’ advisory committee that helped draw up the park’s management plan in the 1990s. He’s also a former president of the Climbers’ Access Society of B.C.

      According to Ourom, with the exception of himself, all of the FOSC organizing committee’s members are Squamish residents. He claimed a “fair number” of people are concerned about the proposal to change the boundaries of the Chief park and are wanting to know more.

      “That suggests that, assuming the proposal should even be considered, the process isn’t quite what’s needed,” Ourom said.

      Sea to Sky principal David Greenfield told the Straight that he was disappointed by the formation of FOSC.

      “We worked very hard to work with the public,” Greenfield said by phone from Squamish. “For them to form this group at this late stage, it’s just disappointing, because there was ample opportunity through the many forums that we had for anybody to come and engage with us. It feels a little late to address if they have any substantive concerns.”

      Greenfield confirmed that Michael Hutchison, chair of the Whistler Housing Authority, is a Sea to Sky director and financial partner. Hutchison is one of the biggest real-estate developers in the Sea to Sky region, he noted.

      Greenfield said he and fellow Sea to Sky principal Trevor Dunn intend to remain owners of the gondola after it commences operations. The gondola proponents held early discussions with experienced resort operators Intrawest and Brewster Travel Canada about partnering on the project, but ultimately decided to build their own company. Greenfield and Dunn are both former Intrawest executives.

      Sea to Sky applied in December to remove a 2.36-hectare strip of land from the southern reaches of the Chief park. The application is now in the second stage of the B.C. government’s two-stage park-boundary-adjustment process.

      The company’s detailed park-adjustment proposal, dated February 15, notes the planned gondola corridor through the park measures 1.18 kilometres long and 20 metres wide. Seven of the 15 gondola towers would be built in the right of way, which would be redesignated from Class A provincial parkland to a protected area.

      According to Greenfield, B.C. Parks staff have recommended approval of the park amendment.

      “As we understand it, they’ve written their recommendation to their department and it’s in Victoria now, I guess, for a decision,” Greenfield said.


      Riders of the Sea to Sky Gondola would pay up to $30 for the trip to Habrich Ridge.

      The Sea to Sky Gondola would carry passengers from a base between the Stawamus Chief and Shannon Falls to the wooded ridge northwest of Mount Habrich in 7.12 minutes. At a speed of 5.08 metres per second, the eight-person cabins would travel a distance of 2,123 metres and a vertical rise of 848 metres.

      Sea to Sky is proposing the addition of four hiking trails and trail linkages in Stawamus Chief Provincial Park. A connector trail would link the gondola base, Shannon Falls, and the Chief viewing area. A Grouse Grind-like “high intensity” trail would connect the Upper Shannon Falls Trail with the top terminal. Sea to Sky also wants to extend the Upper Shannon Falls Trail to deactivated logging roads which link with the upper terminal and Petgill Lake to the south. A fourth trail would connect the Chief’s Third Peak trail with the top terminal through the Olesen Creek valley. The gondola right of way would cross both the Upper Shannon Falls Trail and the trail connecting the Chief and Shannon Falls provincial parks.

      “The Sea to Sky Gondola could become a significant amenity for the Province of BC and has the potential to provide universal access to the stunning natural features in the Sea to Sky Corridor,” the company’s Stage 2 park-adjustment application states. “It can also provide some significant benefits to the parks experience and provide some solutions to some of the challenges currently being experienced by the Stawamus Chief and Shannon Falls Parks.”

      According to the application, the negative impacts from construction and operation of the gondola would be “largely moderate and short term”. Potential negative effects include increased visitation, greater access to unused areas of the park, view impacts, and construction issues, such as tree removal, rock excavation, helicopter noise, and temporary trail closures.

      Sea to Sky says it would need to clear a swath of trees to make way for the gondola towers, which would range in height from 5.57 to 23 metres. An estimated 364 to 597 cubic metres of timber would be logged in the swath, which would have an average width of 12 metres. Douglas-fir, western red cedar, and western hemlock are the dominant tree species in the corridor, with the dominant shrubs being salal and red huckleberry. About 30 “veteran trees” with diameters larger than 70 centimetres would be cut down.

      Several wildlife species at risk could be affected by the gondola corridor. Sea to Sky’s application notes the presence of the northern red-legged frog, which is designated as a species of special concern by the Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada, has been confirmed in the area. Two other species of special concern, the coastal tailed frog and the western toad, are probably present. As well, the company says it’s possible the endangered Pacific water shrew and the threatened olive-sided flycatcher, along with the peregrine falcon, western screech-owl, and band-tailed pigeon—three species of special concern—are in the area.

      On February 7, District of Squamish council granted final approval to rezoning the gondola’s base property and amending the official community plan to allow development of the lower terminal.

      On March 26, the Squamish-Lillooet Regional District board of directors gave the second of four required readings to rezoning and official-community-plan-amendment bylaws needed for the gondola’s upper terminal. The SLRD board has scheduled a public hearing for the Britannia Beach Community Centre (60 Copper Drive) on April 19, starting at 7 p.m.

      Sea to Sky has applied to the B.C. Ministry of Forests, Lands and Natural Resource Operations for permits, leases, and licences of occupation and to the Ministry of Environment for water licences for the upper terminal area.

      According to Sea to Sky’s park-adjustment application, B.C. minister of jobs, tourism and innovation Pat Bell is “very supportive” of the gondola proposal. The company is targeting the spring legislative session for the park-boundary amendment, which must be approved by the environment minister, cabinet, and the legislative assembly.

      Sea to Sky has received letters of support from the Squamish Chamber of Commerce, Downtown Squamish Business Improvement Association, Tourism Squamish, and Squamish Trails Society for the gondola project. According to the company’s application, there has not been a “high level of controversy or public concern” about its plan to alter the boundaries of the 526-hectare Chief park, which was established in 1997.

      However, Ourom and other FOSC organizers plan to attend the upcoming SLRD public hearing and make their opposition to the proposal known.

      “We’re certainly not opposed to a gondola in some other suitable location in the area—as long as it’s not in or close to the parks,” Ourom said.

      For his part, Greenfield asserted that there’s “a lot of distortion” coming from some critics of Sea to Sky’s project. The company hopes to start construction in September and open the gondola on July 1, 2013.

      “We just encourage people to get the right information before they pass any kind of judgment or decision on us,” Greenfield said. “That’s the key message. We are open to anybody to answer those questions if they have them.”

      You can follow Stephen Hui on Twitter, Facebook, and Pinterest.

      Comments

      3 Comments

      Paul Kubik

      Apr 13, 2012 at 6:55am

      The proposal is being rammed through without significant public input. Most forums have been ones organized by the developer. The public was kept in the dark about key elements of the proposal - the fact they were making an end run around the land covenant preventing construction of a gondola on the land they purchased from the Land Conservancy. By working with BC Parks to remove the gondola right of way from the existing park they have shown complete lack of integrity. How can you trust people like that? Whatever they say you have to ask the question, are they telling the truth?

      It's shameful that BC Parks staff have facilitated at every opportunity the removal of land from the park. Just who are they working for?

      The main problem is the town of Squamish itself. Successive councils since 1990 thereabouts have encouraged highway sprawl and strip mall development. Their downtown is a dead end. No one wants to go there. The Chief and Shannon Falls are their main natural assets and protected as park land. Now council wants to commercialize them in order to lure tourist dollars because otherwise no one's visiting Squamish except to buy gas and coffee on the way to Whistler.

      Squamish has a bankrupt vision of how to properly develop a town that people would actually want to stay and visit. The gondola proposal feeds into their catastrophic lack of foresight.

      The proposal should be shot down and the developers run out of town. It's time for some Wild West NIMBY-ism in the Squamish backwater.

      RK

      Apr 13, 2012 at 11:27am

      Once again, we have a special interest group trying to cram their vision of the world down our collective throats. And we will have the usual media propaganda campaigns and letter writing campaigns, and probably roads blocked if they don't get their way.

      Some people enjoy getting up to the heights by hiking, and some don't. Mostly everybody enjoys the view. If there is support for a gondola from the general public, then it should be built. The trails will still be there to hike up to the top. Nobody's taking away anybody's hiking experience. However, the hikers don't seem to have any problem trying to take away the potential for other people to enjoy the area in their own way. Just another form of greed.

      Didn't your mothers ever teach you to share?

      mjf

      Apr 13, 2012 at 12:28pm

      It is unfortunate to see it proposed through the middle of the park? Are they sure there are no other options? Personally I find this questionable, but I have to accept that it will depend on what the majority wants.

      I hope nobody believes that tickets would actually be sold for $30. The Grouse Mountain gondola has a price of $40 and it has a better economy of scale as it carries skiers as well, and being close to Vancouver it is more accessible to tourists. I suspect that Grouse has pushed the price higher than it should be, however, if this does get built, would these developers be happy selling tickets for $30, not at all likely. So I think they are suggesting this lower price for political reasons. I can understand that, as they have to present it in a positive light. However, they are asking for permission to build this through a park, that calls for honesty, so it's better for clarity to say right now that the tickets are hoped to sell for $50 to $60 or whatever.

      If several people do not believe what they say about the ticket price, then what else it not being presented accurately? I think there should be exactly contracted terms to ensure compliance and there should be government control over the prices, whenever a service is sold so integrated with a park.