What I think is unfortunate when bringing these ideas up for debate in the public sphere is that the term neoliberal is vague and imprecise.
This isn’t a typical land-ownership dispute as both CPR and the city have a say in how the land is used.
It is unfortunate that your blurb writer saw fit to ruin the honour with an insulting, condescending swipe that misrepresented the article.
Ng Weng Hoong writes that Canada’s elite are right to push ahead with the expansion of the oilsands and fracked-gas LNG industry but does not even mention climate or ocean acidification.
Please, get the fuck over yourselves.
This year, the odds of breeding successfully have been diminished significantly for the pelagic cormorants that are attempting to nest under the Burrard Street Bridge.
Native stories need to be told by Native People.
Recklessly, the cumulative impacts are not being assessed.
What do bike lanes and Trout Lake dog park have in common?
The aquarium isn’t really in it for the money.
I am appalled by Gwynne Dyer’s article.
This proposal fails several tests of good urban-transit planning.