Canadian authors attack the Google Book Settlement

As the Google Book Settlement heads for another crucial deadline, a group of Canadian authors is ramping up its opposition to the controversial and hugely consequential agreement. Under the terms of the settlement, authors and copyright holders have until January 28 to formally opt out of the Californian corporation’s campaign to digitize and index the collections of major libraries (including those of Harvard, Stanford, Columbia, and Oxford universities), as part of the Google Books Library Project.

The settlement is now in its second version. The original version, reached in the fall of 2008, was revised in response to strong objections from writers’ organizations around the world, as well as from the governments of France and Germany.

The Google project has been heavily disputed since it began in 2004, with many authors and publishers accusing the corporation of serious copyright infringement. Among these are the U.S.-based Authors Guild and the Association of American Publishers, whose 2005 lawsuit against Google eventually resulted in the original settlement, which outlines the terms and revenue models by which Google will display and distribute the digitized books.

Yet the agreement still faces severe criticism from such organizations as the U.S.-based National Writers Union and the American Society of Journalists and Authors, who claim that it is “an abuse of the law and unfair to writers,” in the words of NWU president Larry Goldbetter.

Now a Canadian petition is arguing for the outright rejection of the settlement. The list of the more than 250 names gathered so far includes Wayson Choy, Marilyn Bowering, Ann Ireland, bill bissett, Monique Proulx, Graeme Gibson, and Katherine Gordon. Organizers plan to submit the petition, which calls Google a “predatory corporation”, to the New York court scheduled to hold a February 18 hearing on the fairness of the settlement.

Google Books currently has a database of over seven million searchable books, and the company announced in October of last year that the running total of books scanned has surpassed 10 million.

Comments

3 Comments

dgffhjfhjfhfla

Jan 8, 2010 at 11:29am

only one positive result came out of the 2000s and it's that intellectual copyright is finally dead. instead of fighting and clawing against progress, these dinosaurs need to get with the times and evolve.

this government may agree with them, but this government lives in a fantasy reality. it's just postponing inevitability.

as we move forward, essentially all text will be scanned and digitized and all new literature will exist exclusively within the digital realm. the idea of books made out of paper is now essentially obsolete, as obsolete as clay tablets or papyrus. once data enters the digital realm, it's up for grabs because there's no way to enforce copyright.

they can write all of the laws they want, it won't stop people from ignoring them and it won't change the fact that when my generation takes over we're going to rewrite them all anyways.

so, i say to those that oppose google books to get with the times and stop opposing progress. you'd be better off learning how to survive in our new digital reality than wasting your time fighting a losing battle to turn the clocks back.

YUL

Jan 9, 2010 at 7:56am

The issue is not paper vs. digital -- it's simply right of ownership... and I side with the authors on this. They are entitled to reward for their work...

I am all for digital, but I am also for the opportunity of proper reward for work done.

AFP

Jan 23, 2010 at 7:01am

Agreed, YUL. Writing is an extremely labor-intensive, time-consuming process. Not to reward authors for their work is to discourage writing as a profession: writers need to eat too.