Pascal Spothelfer: Growth in B.C. tech sector requires proactive initiatives

By Pascal Spothelfer

The May 12 provincial election race is on and both the NDP and the Liberal party have released their election platforms. With the global economic crisis as a backdrop, jobs, social issues and the economic response dominate the agenda. Neither party gives the technology industry more than a passing mention.

NDP platform: "Take back your B.C."

The NDP positions itself as the party that will bring change, but their platform provides limited vision for the province, focusing on small pain points rather than the big picture.

We do applaud the NDP for (indirectly) acknowledging the access to capital issues that encumber our industry by committing $200 million of their Green Bond to fund clean technology over the next ten years. However, we disagree with the fiscal instrument chosen. A $10 billion bond issue, however it is branded, still creates $10 billion in new provincial debt. Thus, we prefer the Innovative Clean Energy (ICE) fund introduced in 2008 by the Liberal government that funds $25 million per year for clean energy technology projects through a revenue-neutral energy levy.

Ultimately, capital needs to come from capital markets and from a strong financial services sector. As such, we cannot support the NDP’s re-introduction of a capital tax that burdens B.C.’s financial services sector.

However, we do recognize the NDP for making specific technology recommendations: fuelling technology transfer; acquiring lands in Vancouver’s False Creek Flats to help build the high-tech cluster; developing more technology parks across the province in partnership with local post-secondary institutions.

How technology transfers are to be fuelled is left open, but the principle itself is certainly valuable. Given the ongoing development of the Great Northern Way lands and Discovery Park’s acquisition of the adjoining QLT property, we wonder how the acquisition of dedicated high-tech land will fit into the picture. In the past, the B.C. Technology Industry Association has called for high-tech start-up space and infrastructure, and regional tech parks to facilitate the spin-outs from post-secondary institutions outside the Lower Mainland, and it is an initiative we continue to support.

One area in which we disagree with the NDP’s position is energy. The NDP bashes independent power producers (many of whom use alternative energy technologies) and intends to eliminate B.C. Hydro’s Smart Metering Program. A key component of the Smart Grid, smart meters will help consumers manage their own energy consumption and allow them to sell excess energy back into the grid through net metering. Smart metering improves the potential for local power generation, much of which is based on alternative and green technologies.

Clean energy is one area where B.C. can lead North America and generate wealth for the province, both from energy sales and the export of our technologies and know-how, and we can do this while also reducing our carbon footprint. It does not make sense to sacrifice this future for the sake of votes today.

Liberal party platform: "Keep B.C. strong"

The Liberal party platform contains no surprises, reflecting the budget presented in February. As such, the platform does not introduce any new major initiatives and instead focuses on the party’s proven leadership and continuity in difficult times. The technology industry does receive a brief mention that commits the Liberals to working with all stakeholders within the sector for its advancement, but does not contain specific initiatives.

With the incumbent government we have the benefit of looking at its track record. This yields better insights than the analysis of the platform document. The technology industry as part of the overall business sector has certainly benefited from the Liberals’ re-establishment of a business-friendly environment over the past eight years.

Overall the Campbell government has a strong record for improving the business environment in B.C. Lowering both corporate and personal taxes has provided benefits in the areas of investments, job creation and talent attraction by helping to make B.C. a desirable destination for capital and people. The technology sector has also been helped by incentive programs such as the Venture Capital Corporation (VCC) and Eligible Business Corporation (EBC) tax credits, the ongoing support of the province for the Employee Venture Capital Corp. (EVCC), as well as the formation of the B.C. Renaissance Fund, designed to improve access to later-stage funding. In addition, the Campbell government has taken a leadership position in the reduction of greenhouse gas emissions and has provided a fertile environment for our clean technology companies, which are expected to be a major source of growth for the technology sector in the years to come.

A detailed review of actions taken by the Liberal government over the past eight years is provided in the 12th report of the Premier’s Technology Council, released in mid-April. This report, unlike previous ones, makes few new recommendations. However, it does review the ways in which previous recommendations have been implemented, as well as providing a strategic context for this review. The report also indicates areas where further improvements are required going forward.

There are two areas in the respective party platforms that warrant additional commentary. The first is government procurement. The NDP provides a discussion of potential policies to encourage buying locally, while the Liberals focus on breaking down inter-provincial trade barriers to help create new markets within Canada. The BCTIA supports efforts for procurement provincially and locally, provided such policies don’t incent our companies to stay small by limiting competition through an inefficient market. Domestic procurement by governments (and industry) can facilitate the growth of our companies, allowing them to grow and then export proven solutions outside B.C. using economies of scale, and in the process create real wealth for the province. We do support stronger procurement policies.

The second issue is workplace training, and we urge both parties to reassess their thinking in this area. Both the Liberals and the NDP focus on apprenticeships and corresponding training tax credits for companies with apprentices. While a focus on apprenticeships is beneficial for traditional industries, it completely misses the mark in helping knowledge workers upgrade their skills to retain their relevance and competitive edge, and to commercialize intellectual property. With the BCTIA’s focus on talent, this is one area where we will continue to push for solutions that include the technology sector.

We understand that this election is not being fought over big future concepts, but rather the issues that British Columbians face today in a difficult economic climate. However, once the election is in the books, attention will have to be paid to our economic future.

In our recent work with the Business Council of B.C. on the Opportunities B.C. 2020 project, it became clear that knowledge-based industries will have to complement our traditional reliance on resource-based industries for B.C. to maintain and expand its prosperity. The technology industry will play a key role in this transition over the next 10 years. In addition to providing a favourable business environment and supportive initiatives, the government will have to take a strategic approach in building a more knowledge-based economy.

To that end we will require proactive initiatives that grow our exports, facilitate the growth of larger technology companies, allow us to build on our existing strength in ITC, life sciences, clean tech, and new media, structurally enable the government to plan and act strategically, and continue to improve our education system.

Pascal Spothelfer is the president and CEO of the B.C. Technology Industry Association.

Comments

3 Comments

D J MacArthur

Apr 30, 2009 at 6:49pm

What on earth is a "proactive initiative"?

seth

May 1, 2009 at 1:12pm

More Neocon claptrap.

This man is not here to talk about technology issues he's here to shill for the Liberals. No word on how much he and his organization donated to the cause.

Examples

"A $10 billion bond issue, however it is branded, still creates $10 billion in new provincial debt."

This is a tiny fraction of the 100 billion in off the book IPP obligations his party has committed us to.

Any business wanting to invest in green energy would appreciate access to funds at a quarter what he'd have to pay for it and he will pay the loan back unlike the author's IPP friends who pirated the money from the taxpayers pocket.

25 million in "revenue neutral" levy compares to 10 billion in a capital? Whoever this man purports to represent it's certainly not small business.

"... the NDP’s re-introduction of a capital tax that burdens B.C.’s financial services sector. "
So taxing humongous bank is a bad thing as they donate so much to his leader gordo and gang. Has utterly nothing do with technology.

On energy and IPP's he doesn't have a clue. Buying 80 billion dollars in power over 40 years at 12 cents a kwh makes sense to this party hack , when the current spot price is 2 cents a kwh, Westinghouse just sold 4 nukes to China at 2 cents a kwh and solar PV production costs in the Southwest US desert just dropped below 2 cents a kwh,

Not a clue he has on smart meter proposals. The jury is still out on how much power it saves, but one thing for sure the one billion dollars Gordo proposes to send to his Enron buddies at Accenture to pay for this is 10 times what local BC entrepreneurs that he supposedly represents could do it for.

"...Lowering both corporate and personal taxes has provided benefits in the areas..." will give us the largest deficits in BC history and has greatly reduced our ability to respond to the crisis caused by his Neocon fellow travellers.

".. first is government procurement. " More than half of Gordo's gangland procurement is done without open bids presumably to friends and insiders that donate the most the author's party.

seth

SteveT

May 3, 2009 at 12:42am

Seth,

Who's the shill now?

Apparently, you don't understand the economics of energy. BC has cheap energy (which is why we squander it) because our energy comes from large hydro-electric dams, many of which were built 50 years ago or more (the last major dam was Revelstoke, 25 years ago).

Of course these historic projects are considerably cheaper to operate. They have long since been capitalized, and their operational costs are incredibly cheap (all you have to do is open the dam and let the water flow). New projects have to be paid for in today's dollars, and the price of the energy needs to reflect the price of the capital required to build the projects as well as the cost to operate the facilitate on an annual basis. Even BC Hydro's new projects will cost substantially more than the 2 cents/kwh you cite.

And although solar might be approaching 2 cents per kwh to operate in the southwest US (I'd be interested to see that source), you once again neglect to factor-in the cost of building the projects, not just operating them.

As for smart metering, it has been proven in smaller campuses and neighbourhoods that once people understand the power they consume in real-time, then they can make the changes necessary to reduce their consumption - essentially a power consumption limbo dance.

Plus, as was cited, smart meters are required for net metering - allowing consumers to generate their own electricity and sell it to the grid. That's why Obama is looking to spend $40 billion to provide smart metering in the US. Do you think he's wrong too?

The long and the short of it is, don't call someone else a shill while you're blatantly shilling too.