Bulk of $10-million arts legacy fund going to B.C. Spirit Festival Days, NDP MLA says
The bulk of the new $10-million arts legacy fund that B.C. Liberals promised in their March budget is earmarked for a new B.C. Spirit Festival Days, NDP MLA and culture critic Spencer Chandra Herbert says he has discovered.
Chandra Herbert said Tourism, Culture and the Arts Minister Kevin Krueger made reference to the new event at the recent launch of the Klahowya Village at the Stanley Park mini train. When he pursued the issue later with the minister, Chandra Herbert says he was told the new, multicommunity festival would launch in February 2011 and then take place over the next two years, drawing funds from the legacy money.
Pointing out that arts festivals were recently dropped from gaming funding, Chandra Herbert said: “It’s interesting because we have a number of good festivals that need support already. The government is speaking out of both sides of their mouth. They claim they support festivals [with this new event], and yet they don’t.”
Vancouver arts groups, who are reeling from severe cuts to gaming funding and a 50-percent slash to the B.C. Arts Council, have called for the $10 million to be distributed by the by the arm’s-length council.
“They’ve eviscerated the B.C. Arts Council by cutting them by 50 percent, they’ve decimated gaming funding. People just want stable funding for the arts, distributed by a jury process,” Chandra Herbert said.
“I hope these are not going to be government propaganda festivals,” he added, pointing out the festival will run in the three years that lead up to the next election.
The Ministry of Tourism, Culture and the Arts did not provide the Straight with any details by deadline.



Follow us on Twitter
Like us on Facebook
Comments
Again, it still sounds like these arts groups have had their allowance taken away and are upset that it's going to a new festival. When the previous festivals that should have been using that government money to make their festivals profitable in the first place, to eliminate the need for funding.
The lesson that we can take from that previous debacle, back in the dying days of the Vanderzalm/Johnston government, is that a government-run festival will deliver almost nothing in terms of community benefit, will result in presentations of inferior quality, and will not reverse the fortunes of this incompetent, self-serving, and arrogant government.
What the hell are BC Spirit days and who is behind them, who are the organizers and do they have one clue what they are doing??
Festivals by their very nature are incapable of being "profitable" on their own as the ticket prices are simply not enough to pay the meagre salaries their employees earn and costs of renting giant tents and staging equipment..
Its greatly insulting for you (or anyone else who believes as you do) to be such a tunnel visioned fool to actually say this garbage without having clue one what you are talking about.
Bury your head a bit deeper in the sand and try to defend the government cutting 90% of a profitable sector which invests solely in local economies, and which makes up a colossal 1% of the goverment's overall budget. Take off the damn blinders and wake up. Someone should.
Read Mr. Robinson's post again and again until it finally sinks in. Governments around the world see the value of investing in the arts. The only government in the Western world that doesn't see that is the Campbell government of BC. Governments must promote and fund that arts because they would cost too much for you to attend if they didn't. So, their investment helps you attend the event. Do you get it, Ben? One company in Vancouver charges $267 + change to attend their show because that's what it actually costs without help from various levels of government. Nobody can afford it.
The arts will NEVER be profitable, Ben, but the work they do brings a quality of life to where you live; the people who work in the arts are good neighbours because they don't care about how much money you make; and the people who visit here from around the world want to see what BC has in the way of new music, dance, theatre, film and visual art - so they can leave BC with a whole new vision of what we're about because they attended an event that didn't rip a hole in their wallets.
I could go on and on, Ben , about the importance of the arts to the quality of life in this province. But my main priority right now is to help you get your head out of your ass. The world is a better place than the one you're experiencing (lonely, dark, dank and smelly), so please, get it out now. Save your life and leave your children a better world than the one you experience. Wake up!
What the BC Libs have just done is cut the BC Arts Council's budget in half. There was public outcry, so they created this $10M slush fund. EVeryone in the industry was recommending that they give that money to the BC Arts Council, but then they'd look like they were admitting they'd made a mistake before, so instead? Hmm, let's create some festival - 3 years, $10M!?!?!?!? They're going to spend THAT much money on 6-8 weeks of productions?? If Ben's still reading - you can take it to the bank that this is the least 'profitable' or productive way of spending that money. Business start-ups are hit-and-miss - the same is true in the arts.
To Janet Smith - great article, thanks for writing - too bad it missed the print edition. I'd really like to know what reply Coleman was able to give to Herbert's very good questions.
When Humanities are expanded in our education system, and respected by the population, say like in Europe, then we can renegotiate how well the government is able to assess the arts. Right now, the only thing the government is able to do, and yet won't, is fund the organizations that are run by people who have dedicated their lives by way of education and ongoing production of contemporary art.
Everything else has been said quite well above.
like Don said, Festivals can be profit making only if they charge $250-500 a weekend. And when they do the public cries treason screaming about elitism and profiteering. Tell me what is wrong with making arts affordable and available to ALL of our society rather than just the rich? Do you have no value for the arts? Do you listen to music? Watch TV? Go to the movies? All of those, even big-budget shows and movies are sponsored, either by the government or corporations. believe me whoever is paying for it is doing it with YOUR money, whether you've given it to Telus/Rogers or taxes.
"BC Spirit" echoes the BC Spirit Committees that were set up to boost support around the province for the Olympics. By sprinkling a bit of $$ in smaller communities, the govt was attempting to divert attention from the lavish splurge going on in Vancouver, Richmond and Whistler. Sounds like more of the same strategy.
www.claireart.ca
The right wing trend in North American governments has tried to defend conservative ineptitude by slashing taxes - along with the social services funded by those taxes. Has any conservative politician ever proposed a pay-cut or pay freeze on elected officials instead? No.
Hard-working middle- and lower-class families always welcome the opportunity to save a little more money, yet they are not given the choice as to from which social services they would like to see those tax-cuts taken. What percentage of BC voters would approve a cut to their MLAs' salaries? Probably more than the percentage of people who would prefer their children to grow up in a cultureless society.
Conservatives dislike public scrutiny and the subsequent ridicule that come from free expression. They fear change.
A vibrant and diverse arts community poses the threat of a galvanized and passionate electorate - and change.
The people of British Columbia deserves responsible and responsive government, and leadership that will promote the vision of a just, tolerant and inclusive society.
The actions of the Campbell government are unjust, intolerant, and exclusive. They reveal a philosophy of elitism, ignorance, and misanthropy thinly masked by the pretense of economy.
The next government of BC must - and will - represent the growing cultural diversity of our Province, and be dedicated to fostering a skilled and creative artistic community by restoring gaming funds through publicly-chosen arts-funding juries!
Funding is simply good business, every dollar in, three dollars back. even the conservatives know that
but
they are not Publicly chosen juries, it is the arts council that is elitist unfortunately. Many Many Artist have also committed their lives to their arts and have no say in this process, and no avenue to express dissent. We live in a democratic country with no democratic process for arts funding, big big problem.
Part 2
Visual artists who hardly receive anything, particularly painters raise hundreds of thousands of dollars ever year thru charities, Splash, Unite with Art, Art for Life, it goes on and on, and most of these charities the artists receive nothing. Most of these artists, some who are blatantly commercial and many who are the same we see in our funded galleries and showing work as daring as other venues, present their work in galleries that are paid by private individuals with no tax dollars spent, free to everyone. And NO they are not "intimidating"
While I have received wages from festivals and companies that were able to that because of funding, I create my own income and raised close to $80,000 for charity, the latest being unite with art fighting aids in Africa, so save your get your head out of your ass comments for the Man
We need funding to the Arts but stop presenting artists as existing only with that funding,or worse yet that we all seem to know each other and agree on what constitutes quality Most artist in BC get NO funding from the BC arts council anyway. The public doesn't care because they (the council)have done nothing to promote themselves or their closed door organization , it is they that are to blame for this situation by not being publicly chosen and not engaging the society at large. We need a lot more funding, we need festivals and venues free of profit as the bottom line, that promote exploration and discovery and a lot more democracy in the process.