Houses used as marijuana grow-ops are sometimes a bargain

On May 30, a house in Surrey changed hands for $450,000, although the 2,200-square-foot property had a rather edgy past. When a couple of buyers expressed interest, they found it difficult to get financing. Another buyer found Rowan Smith, a Vancouver-based mortgage broker, and the sale was made.

The house was once used for a marijuana grow operation, and Smith is one of a few mortgage specialists who deal with these properties.

“It’s a niche,” Smith told the Georgia Straight in a phone interview. “Even though it’s not the bulk of my business, I get a lot of referrals from other brokers. I don’t want to call it a loss leader, but if I can help someone out with a former grow-op, explain to them all the risks and the difficulties of doing it, they often don’t buy it. But they buy something else, and I end up doing that deal for them.”

Though buying former grow-op properties isn’t for everyone, Smith said it could be worth the risk for some.

“If they’re going to buy it, fix it up, and flip it off, then it can be worth it,” he said. “They could make a considerable amount. The downside is it’s getting harder and harder and harder to finance them. If someone’s going to live in it for an extended period of time, then it’s probably not a bad idea, because they can buy them below market value. But if they are concerned about resale, and they should be concerned about it, then I would encourage them to do something else.”

In the case of the Surrey house for which Smith arranged the mortgage, the seller bought the property at a discount in 2001 from a previous owner who was busted for cultivating cannabis. The buyer fixed the place and lived in it.

Just like the previous seller, Smith’s client is required to disclose the property’s history when the house is put up for sale. A new buyer would again have to find a lending institution willing to write the mortgage.

“It’s still treated with the same scrutiny as one that was just busted last week,” Smith explained.

According to Wayne Mah, a mortgage broker, major banks will not touch a property with a history of illegal drug operations. The few lenders that do so will require proof of remediation and air-quality testing even if the house has been sold and occupied before.

“Right now, there’s only two or three lenders in this market still doing them,” Mah told the Straight in a phone interview.

A number of reports give some indication of the extent of grow operations across the region.

The Vancouver Police Department stated in its 2009 annual report that there were 455 “confirmed marijuana grows” in 2001 and that the number dropped to 81 in 2008. On April 13, 2010, the City of Surrey put out a news release stating that 1,144 “locations were rendered safe” from March 2005 to December 2009.

A paper prepared for the Fraser Valley Real Estate Board in 2008 cited federal-government statistics indicating that British Columbia’s incidence of marijuana-growing operations is 79 per 100,000 population, which is almost three times the national average. It also stated that 72 percent of B.C. cultivation is in the Lower Mainland and on Vancouver Island.

According to Dion Dunbar, general manager of Masters Remediation Services, it takes an average cost of $10,000 to clean up a house where marijuana was farmed.

In a phone interview with the Straight, former FVREB president Kelvin Neufeld noted that there are thousands of active and former grow-ops across the province.

Despite potential health and safety risks from living in former grow houses that haven’t been properly fixed, Neufeld observed that “there are a lot of people that don’t care because they’re buying a grow-op that’s worth less money and, therefore, they can have a house.”

Neufeld added that the FVREB is pushing a number of recommendations regarding former grow-op properties, including having standard procedures for reporting and remediation of these houses.

Comments

6 Comments

ConservativeChristian

Jun 9, 2011 at 10:50am

Jesus said to do unto others as we would have them to do unto us. None of us would want our child thrown in jail with the sexual predators over marijuana. None of us would want to see an older family member’s home confiscated and sold by the police for growing a couple of marijuana plants for their aches and pains. It’s time to stop putting our own family members in jail over marijuana.
Next step: How about $100 for a permit to grow a dozen plants? We can use the money to fix our roads, and it will put the drug gangs out of business for good!

Jordan Macnab

Jun 10, 2011 at 1:58pm

Depending on how bad the mould is.......it's definitely profitable.
But I wouldn't compromise my health to save a few bucks.
www.vancitylofts.com

Heather smith

Jun 12, 2011 at 12:40pm

The heading "Farms become homes" is so misleading and lame. Was it an article about farms allowing people to put cute little non invasive houses on so people can have a nice rural place to live? No, it's about grow ops, which are NOT farms. I used to rent a house that had previously been a grow-op. Either my landlord was a naive ninny or didn't care. I saw the tell tale signs and she was like ooooh my, but failed to investigate further. There were tubs of fertilizer everywhere, the garden beds had been filled with used hydroponic soil mix and pellets which created the most warped sad garden I ever grew.
Moisture damage, mold, rot, and subsequent structural damage are the obvious problems. I got very sick in that house from the mold and rot. Constant colds, sinus and lung problems, brain fog etc.. Not to mention grey black mold crawling up the walls! The climate is damp and many houses in rural areas are not properly insulated, so the mold/rot problems are even worse.
There are also problems with electric wiring being tampered with, raw wiring, home mademade hacks etc which are fire risks. Recently, a grow-op in Sechelt that caught on fire was left to burn because of dangerous wiring and possible booby trapping. From what I have read, it is recommended to gut the house or tear it down and rebuild. The land is what is really valuable, so one could either build a humble abode, or something high density. People should not be gambling with their health to save money, especially if there are issues with even getting a mortgage or insurance on such a house.
Grow ops in houses is a huge problem. On the Sunshine Coast, you need only be out in the early evening and you can smell the pot wafting through the air. When I bike home from work, or am biking out and about, I sometimes swear I get a contact high from all the different grow ops. I am surprised the RCMP don't get on their bikes and sniff out the grow ops. Would save them alot of money and sneakiness with their 'undercover' street crews. It's a shame people have to resort to hiding their grow ops in houses where it is unsafe.

Pete Shpak

Aug 29, 2013 at 1:42pm

I have had quite a few clients look at turning past grow-ops in to their family home. After all the
potential problems with electrical, mould, and the stigmata of living somewhere where illegal activity has taken place drives them away from the home. As a
<a target="_blank" href="http://www.vuppie.com">Vancouver Realtor</a> you need to be sure to provide all of the facts and potential problems that could arise... or your reputation could be ruined, and that's the only thing you really have in this business!

Darren Anonson

Oct 19, 2013 at 11:52am

This really should be assessed on a case by case basis. Use a <a href="http://anonson.com">REALTOR in Vancouver, BC whom you trust and due your proper due-diligence before you buy. If everything checks out and the reward outweighs the risk, then buy it after making an informed decision.

Judy

Apr 21, 2014 at 11:18pm

My family is considering buying a previous (2003) grow-op townhouse. City Record shows that it was a minor grow-op which did not require Remediation or Re-occupancy permit. Are there still health implications after 11 years?