Georgia and Dunsmuir viaducts study seen as a "test" for Vancouver

    1 of 1 2 of 1

      Real-estate consultant Bob Laurie says he has observed a "significant change in attitude" since the arrival of Vancouver’s top planner, Brian Jackson.

      But while Laurie says Jackson has engaged with residents, the real-estate veteran calls the next phase of work on the Georgia and Dunsmuir viaducts a "test" for the city.

      Laurie told the Straight by phone that because there’s a two-year plan for analysis on the removal of the viaducts, there’s plenty of time for city officials to demonstrate that "their actions speak louder than their words".

      "Brian is talking about community engagement, but this will be a real test…to see what that means—and how is it different from previous directors of planning and previous council policies," Laurie added.

      City council approved recommendations Wednesday evening (June 26) for two years of planning work concerning the viaducts, including negotiations with neighbouring landowners and discussions with communities. Laurie said he "conditionally" supports the removal of the structures.

      "You drop a big boulder in a pond and everything ripples out," he stated. "So when you eliminate two viaducts, you’ve got to make damn sure that everything else connects."

      Laurie, chair of the community affairs committee of the Vancouver Board of Trade, said he would oppose rezoning of industrial or work areas to residential, but supports an "integrated mix" in the region. He added he respects the position that neighbourhoods such as Strathcona and Grandview-Woodland have taken on the issue.

      "They want to connect the dots too, and they’re not just rolling over and saying, ‘Yeah, let’s replace one freeway with another,’ " Laurie said.

      Former COPE councillor Tim Louis is skeptical about the outcome of consultations, including on the level of affordability for residential development in the area. COPE wants to see 20 percent of new units dedicated to social housing, with tenants paying a maximum of one third of their income on rent.

      "Our concern is that it will be consultation of the type that we’ve seen now for the last four years that Vision Vancouver has been in control," Louis told the Straight by phone. "At the end of the day, the best staff in the world, doing the best they can, can’t make a difference if city council is close-minded."

      Comments

      4 Comments

      Kelly Seabrook

      Jun 27, 2013 at 8:47am

      You do not need to waste money on another consultation.

      The only way to properly dismantle the viaducts is to build a more desirable replacement first. Tunnel (see Boston, Los Angeles, Seattle) or grade separated transit are necessary to avoid buying waste (time, pollution, cost, lost opportunities) by attempting to divert trips down Hastings where the city is presently spending money on mid-block crosswalks for wayward junkies.

      Until they find the money (see bad decision to bailout Fortress Investment Group for a 20% profit on the Olympic Village loan that they failed to finish providing when the city still owned the land, and could have taken over the buildings at half the price it did due to performance requirements in the contract), this is pointless. Maybe they should go back and start valuing Concord Pacific's vacant lots between Science World and the arena for more than the $200,000 they do for tax purposes, if Concord is pushing them to spend money they do not have.

      SouthVancouver

      Jun 27, 2013 at 1:45pm

      Who on earth voted the Kelly Seabrook down... twice?! Not that you can't have your own opinion, but I'm smh trying to understand you

      cuz

      Jun 27, 2013 at 3:44pm

      I love it when political hacks talk like they have a clue. They want to "connect the dots". That's basically talking without saying anything. I hear a lot of talk about tearing down the viaducts, but NOTHING about what to replace them with. And you will have to replace them with something. 40,000 cars a day will not just disappear, in fact, the will just reappear in Yaletown and be sitting there through extremely long traffic jams just because someone doesn't like cars and doesn't have a clue about urban planning. This isn't about making the city better, it's about making some developers richer!!! Wake up people.

      Tiny

      Jul 1, 2013 at 5:41pm

      Big Waste Of Taxpayer's Money !!!!!! Guess These Dimwits Have Nothing Else To Do.