Why B.C. residents should pay attention to a Trident nuclear submarine scandal in Britain

    1 of 3 2 of 3

      For decades, B.C. peace activists have been raising an alarm about nuclear-weapons-carrying submarines travelling through Georgia Strait.

      When Jean Chrétien was prime minister, Nanoose Conversion Campaign worker Norm Abbey alleged that the Nanoose Bay naval base near Nanaimo had become a "branch plant" of the U.S. Navy's undersea-warfare operations.

      Abbey noted that at least three Trident vessels fitted with "targeted nuclear warheads" had visited the base.

      "U.S. submarines have been using Nanoose Bay since 1965, when they moved north from the more densely populated waters of Puget Sound," wrote Abbey in Peace Magazine. "Residents of urban centers like Seattle didn't want the nuclear safety hazards, and Ottawa obliged by signing the 'Canada-U.S. Nanoose Agreement' in 1965."

      Trident nuclear-weapon-armed submarines are back in the news after a British whistleblower wrote an alarming 18-page report citing many safety risks.

      "We are so close to a nuclear disaster it is shocking, and yet everybody is accepting the risk to the public," wrote seaman William McNeilly, who is now in custody.

      This week, his brother Aaron told STV News that his family supports McNeilly's efforts to alert the public. "I'm very proud of my brother for what he has done."

      He also insisted that his brother is not a liar.

      William McNeilly turned himself into authorities after revealing secrets about Trident subs.

      In 1995, the Straight reported that under a series of 10-year agreements, the U.S. pays to operate a torpedo test range on Winchelsea Island in Nanoose Bay. Canada covers the salaries of Canadian civilian staff.

      In 1999, Ottawa expropriated the nearby provincially owned seabed so that testing could continue. This came after an NDP government had threatened to cancel the lease if ships carrying nuclear weapons entered the area.

      The expropriation was challenged in court by the Society Promoting Environmental Conservation. It won the first round in the Federal Court of Canada but in 2003, the Federal Court of Appeal upheld the expropriation.

      Since then, no B.C. premier or Canadian prime minister has publicly questioned the wisdom of U.S. submarines entering B.C. waters carrying nuclear weapons.

      Nanoose Bay is in the Nanaimo Regional District.
      More

      Comments

      7 Comments

      USN Bubblehead

      May 28, 2015 at 10:16am

      And what difference does it make if a noat transits the warers... Oh wait - Its the politicians you are after, isn't it ?
      - Not the nation who has saved the world more times than any other !
      DISREGARD MY LAST

      Another USN Bubbleheads

      May 28, 2015 at 8:20pm

      Total crap! Scare tactics based on misinformation.

      Martin Dunphy

      May 28, 2015 at 10:16pm

      Another:

      Please feel free to detail the "misinformation", by all means.

      LMAO

      May 29, 2015 at 5:19pm

      This is an incredibly naive piece: the people of Seattle are surrounded by nuclear weapons and targets besides the city. If Norm Abbey believes the move to Nanoose was somehow because the people of Seattle were upset with the presence of nukes he is delusional. As for the whining about Nanoose, I have been hearing it for decades and it still doesn't grab me as an "issue." One fun note is how the BC NDP government suddenly realized the situation in 1999, was the futile effort to block the U.S. part of a desperate ploy to find some much needed support before their reduction to two seats? Vision Parks Board candidates tried that gambit with their new found love for cetaceans almost a year ago but still lost their majority.

      Pat Crowe

      May 29, 2015 at 5:23pm

      Living in the blast zone of Bangor Washington{the Trident base} kind of negates the concern one might have of Los Angeles classed subs torpedo testing at Nanoose.

      Brit

      May 29, 2015 at 5:41pm

      then why Are there signs everywhere in nanaimo & nanoose bay saying entering a nuclear free weapons zone!?

      Martin Dunphy

      May 29, 2015 at 5:49pm

      Brit:

      Those signs were (in the case of Nanaimo, anyhow) first erected in 1987 after city council passed a nuclear-free bylaw. The signs went missing and were reinstalled in 1983 (guess they make cool rec-room decor), and then again in 2013. (Vancouver also used to have those signs at city limits.)