Gwynne Dyer: JOIDES research shows global warming will accelerate

    1 of 1 2 of 1

      The news is bad, and it’s coming in fast.

      Turn tens of thousands of scientists loose on a problem for two decades, and the results will seem pathetic for the first few years, because it takes time to gather the data–even to build the equipment with which you gather the data. But slowly the flow of data will grow, and at the end of 20 years you can expect major new insights every month or so.

      That’s where we are now with climate change. September’s unwelcome news from the Hadley Centre for Climate Prediction and Research in Britain, was that if fossil fuel use continues on the present trend line, the planet will be an average of 4 degrees Celsius warmer by the 2060s.

      This contrasts with the prediction of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, published in 2007, that we might see 4 degrees Celsius, at the most, by 2100.

      This month’s bad news came from the drilling ship JOIDES Resolution (Joint Oceanographic Institutions for Deep Earth Sampling), which brought up cores from the ocean bottom containing sediments dating back 20 million years.

      Scientists reported that when the carbon dioxide in the atmosphere was last at 450 parts per million, the average global temperature was  3 to 6  degrees Celsius hotter than now, and the sea level was 25 to 40 metres higher.

      That is bad news because 450 parts per million is where we are hoping to halt the rise in  carbon dioxide  in the atmosphere this time around. (We are currently at 390 parts per million.)

      All the world’s major governments have agreed in principle that the warming must never be allowed to exceed 2 degrees Celsius, because beyond that we risk runaway warming–and it was thought that 450  parts per million  would let us stop at that point.

      Not so, it would appear, or at least not for long. The leader of the JOIDES research team, Aradhna Tripati of the University of California at Los Angeles, put it bluntly: "What we have shown is that in the last period when CO2 levels were sustained at levels close to where they are today, there was no icecap on Antarctica and sea levels were 25-40m higher."

      Suspicions that the 450  parts per million  target is much too high have been growing for some time. Late in 2007 James Hansen, the director of NASA’s Goddard Institute for Space Studies in New York, made a public appeal at a meeting of the American Geophysical Union to move to a 350  parts per million  target.

      Hansen’s study of ancient climates had led him to the conclusion that the first time permanent ice appeared on the planet–after a complete absence for tens of millions of years–was when the amount of carbon dioxide fell to 425 parts per million  some 35 million years ago.

      His calculations had a possible error of plus or minus 75 parts per million, so for safety’s sake he settled on 350  parts per million  as the long-term target for human stewardship of the atmosphere.

      Did that word “stewardship” throw you? Many people instinctively recoil from any direct human intervention in the atmosphere, on the grounds that we don’t know enough to get it right. But when we have already been changing the atmosphere unintentionally for two centuries, since the start of the industrial revolution, it’s a bit late for such qualms.

      We have already destabilized it, and only we can reverse the changes we have caused.

      Hansen even thought that 350  parts per million  might still be too high, because the “normal” level of CO2 during the 10,000 years of human civilisation, before we began burning fossil fuels, was only 280 parts per million. Now JOIDES has given us a more accurate measure of ancient climate, from closer to the present.

      By 20 million years ago, almost all the ice on the planet had been lost again, due to a prolonged period of volcanic activity in the Columbia River basin of North America.

      The carbon dioxide emitted by that activity had raised the average global temperature to 3 to 6 degrees Celsius above the current level, and all the melted ice had raised the seal level by 25 to 40 metres. But the actual level of CO2 that caused all that was only 400 parts per million.

      We will be there in five years, but we must not stay there for very long or history will repeat itself. In reality, we are going to go to at least 450 parts per million, and more likely 500 parts per million, before we get our emissions under control.

      Then we will have to commence the long and arduous task of getting the CO2 in the atmosphere down to a level that will preserve our present climate over the long term. That may have to be as low as 300 parts per million.

      And all through that time, we must prevent the warming from exceeding 2 degrees Celsius, which means that a resort to various methods of geo-engineering to keep the heat down is almost unavoidable. That is what these numbers are telling us, and we would be wise to listen.

      Gwynne Dyer’s latest book, Climate Wars, was published recently in  Canada by Random House.

      Comments

      6 Comments

      Goldorak

      Oct 30, 2009 at 9:20am

      Old news and simplistic pseudo science with a young PhD girl thrown in the mix for good measure. Really Dyer, aren't you tired of fearmongering and disinformation? Or is it your background is complete utter ignorance of Earth Sciences, meteorology and climatology?

      Since 20 million years ago, Earth has enjoyed many climatic shifts and geologic shifts that had nothing to do with CO2 concentration. One even wonders how did planet Earth managed to get down to 280 from the 450 without Gwynne Dyer's guilt spewing and scare tactics... LOL

      Cesar Hechler

      Oct 30, 2009 at 6:10pm

      Brilliant commentary, Goldorak. You must have a PhD in unctuous snarkiness, do you have ANY qualifications in the things you claim Dyer lacks knowledge of? Do you wish to cite examples of people working arduously on research that says we should just sit around like jerks like you and finish off the planet with grotesque displays of rampant consumerism, ignorant selfishness and incapability of understanding plot points on graphs. All that instead of making preparations for maintaining a planet for future people who might actually want land and water to have the bare necessities for survival in case worst case scenarios play out as anticipated by 95% of the people actually educated enough to be doing research in this stuff. All I see is another ass in a chair who doesn't give two craps about anything as long as he can stuff his face while mentally masturbating to Xbox or PSIII. Meanwhile, some of us have to pay attention and do twice as much because we have kids or grandkids who could very much be in a fight for their very existence because of ignorant slobs like you who just wanted excuses for ignorant excesses.

      Stevie

      Oct 31, 2009 at 12:24am

      I'm still waiting for these global warming researchers to explain how man-made carbon emissions are responsible for raising the surface temperatures of the other planets and celestial bodies in the solar system--like the moons of Saturn and Jupiter for instance. Yes, remarkabley enough, EVERY planet seems to be getting warmer at the same time as the earth is!

      Be careful, Goldorak, about riling the beliefs of the global warming crowd. Man-made climate change is the new, official, state-sanctioned religion, and these types tend to take their beliefs VERY seriously. Best just leave them be, and let them worship at their Earth-Day gatherings. Oh, and don't forget to pay your church tithes, er, I mean, carbon taxes!

      K1W1

      Oct 31, 2009 at 6:58am

      Cesar - PhD in histrionics?

      I bet you feel good and smug while you're busy doing twice as much riding your bike, turning off two lights instead of just one and living the austere life while you fret twice as much about how to save the world and the very existence of your children and grandchildren... Pity it wont make a dot of difference.

      Even if everyone in the world started today living as Cesar purports to do it would make no difference to climate change. If every coal powered generator in the world was shut down and all the cars taken away it would still not make a difference to climate change because increasing CO2 does not cause the temperature to rise. Rather, a rise in the temperature cases an increase of CO2.

      As Dyer says in his article, the only way to reduce CO2 in the atmosphere is through geo-engineering projects - and most of those will make your local strip mine seem like a botanic garden by comparison. But even our best effort at geo-engineering would be to no avail if there was another event such as the period of volcanic activity in the Columbia River basin of North America...

      snout

      Nov 2, 2009 at 8:47am

      State sanctioned religion? Wow thats just completely inaccurate at so many levels.

      cameronjamesmarthur@live.co.uk

      Nov 2, 2009 at 10:38pm

      DID ANYBODY NOTICE THAT AFTER 40 YEARS OF MASSIVELY TAXED WESTERN FEAR, THE SOVIETS ONLY EVER NUKED THEMSELVES(CHERNOBYL)! fear of aids was used in the reelection campaigns of thatcher and reagan and similar fear is used by incumbents of the left. it had been felt that fear favoured conservative politics.global warming(or cooling) is a political power ploy. only al gore(or his intellectual equivalent predecessor dan quail) could spout such drivel and be believed.if tricky dicky or slick willy relayed this message a drunken scientologist could smell snake oil.as always,follow the money to find the perp. regards cam