Maple Ridge woman defends Facebook group supporting men linked to alleged gang rape

    1 of 1 2 of 1

      Since the news broke last week of an alleged gang rape in Pitt Meadows, thousands of people have banded together on-line in a show of support for the young victim.

      As of this afternoon (September 21), a Facebook page titled “Support for 16yr old victim in Pitt Meadows” has been endorsed by over 10,000 people, many of whom have shared sentiments like, “You’re in our thoughts. Be well, and be strong.”

      But not everyone is ready to accept that what happened the night of September 10 was rape.

      A Facebook group called “Reasonable Doubt in Pitt Meadows” claims to be “for the people who have yet to jump on the bandwagon headed out to lynch the men/boys involved in the alleged sexual assault of a 16yr old from Pitt Meadows”.

      It had more than 130 members, as of this afternoon.

      Kayla Smith, one of the creators of the “Reasonable Doubt” group, told the Straight by phone that she’s concerned about the treatment of the males linked to the incident.

      “No one thinks how it’s going to affect his life and how he feels,” Smith said of the 18-year-old man arrested by police in connection with the case.

      A 16-year-old boy, who allegedly photographed the incident and posted the pictures on Facebook, was also arrested and released.

      Police have been steadfast in their statements that the sex in the incident wasn’t consensual.

      But Smith, a 22-year-old Maple Ridge resident who is friends with the arrested 18-year-old, said that she isn’t buying it.

      “In my opinion, she wasn’t raped,” Smith said.

      Daisy Kler, a spokesperson for Vancouver Rape Relief and Women’s Shelter, told the Straight that she isn’t surprised that blame is being put on the young rape victim.

      “Unfortunately, it’s her character and behaviour that is being scrutinized,” she said by phone. “What that does is let men off the hook in the discussion of them being responsible for violence against women and, in this case, rape.”

      According to Kler, nobody is saying due process shouldn’t occur in this case.

      However, she said that more discussion needs to happen about what consent sounds and looks like.

      “No woman who has been drinking is able to give consent,” Kler said. “That’s it. The whole discussion of whether or not she willfully took the GHB is completely moot. It doesn’t matter.”

      Comments

      30 Comments

      Stephen Greene

      Sep 21, 2010 at 5:48pm

      The 16 year old that took pictures needs to be in jail now. That is a crime
      weather the girl was raped or not!

      11 9Rating: +2

      miguel

      Sep 21, 2010 at 6:46pm

      It's someone like Smith that reinforces why I hate people.
      Miguel

      12 9Rating: +3

      glen p robbins

      Sep 21, 2010 at 7:14pm

      I've hung out with some of the toughest dudes, and baddest of the bad boys anyone could imagine - and none of them would be ever be involved in something like this.

      Of that, there is no doubt.

      10 7Rating: +3

      beelzebub

      Sep 21, 2010 at 7:42pm

      "“In my opinion, she wasn’t raped,” Smith said." Spoken like a true product of all that's wrong with society today. Like maybe she like really knows like the guys and like they are real like cool you know and like they didnt do this like it was her like she's such a you know......

      8 5Rating: +3

      Bellanouva

      Sep 21, 2010 at 8:00pm

      I dont think I could be more horrified about this; the idea that despite witnesses that do corroborate her story, and physical evidence, people still disbelieve this girl is absurd. Teenagers and mob mentality- good luck protecting your own, and when it happens again- which it will if the guys you're protecting get away it -I hope your not the one found in a compromised position, never suspecting that your so called friend would ever do that to you. The fact that the majority of these naysayers are women, also horrifies me. I suggest to anyone reading this to go to the support page, send some positivity to this girl. And to the teenagers who are enjoying a) the attention they are getting by saying this girl wasn't raped b) enjoying victimizing her even more, read up on the realities of rape, the bystander effect, victim blame, and then take a really long look in the mirror. If you can still stomach looking at yourself, then something is seriously wrong with you.
      P.S if you are an eyewitness, and were at the rave, and have any courage at all to stand up and say something about what happened, contact police. Dont be part of the mob.

      9 7Rating: +2

      Jay W.

      Sep 21, 2010 at 8:20pm

      No woman who has been given GHB could consent- what does that say about the character of the young males that participated in this. "nice' isn;t a word that I use- not saying much about their upbringing either. If they have to incapacitate someone in order to ....... there is nothing more to say(losers)

      8 8Rating: 0

      John Smith

      Sep 21, 2010 at 8:22pm

      “No woman who has been drinking is able to give consent,” Kler said. “That’s it. The whole discussion of whether or not she willfully took the GHB is completely moot. It doesn’t matter.”

      - that means any time a male and female are drinking together then willing engage in a sexual act; the male is a rapist no matter what because no woman is able to give consent while drinking?

      13 5Rating: +8

      Bellanouva

      Sep 21, 2010 at 9:54pm

      What is the definition of consent? Its basically an issue of capacity- diminished capacity in this case. Was she drunk? Yes, and was she drunk, (or drugged, voluntarily or otherwise) so much so that she could not have the capacity to have made that decision. The answer, as police are arguing but unfortunately can not discuss with evidence because of an ongoing investigation is YES. These are criminal investigators that are examining this case with a fine tooth comb. There is a chemical level from which a human being can not have the capacity to make safe, coherent, judgments. Lets not get caught up in fallacies.
      Moreover, there is her age; shes 16, technically the age of consent, but again, there are stipulations on that consent and how it is defined.
      The images also complicate this because the act by its recording, of a minor, regardless of her being the age of consent, has made the act illegal (both because it was filmed, and because, as Im sure evidence will dictate soon, it was not consensual).
      John Smith- I understand that you want to make a case for consent as you deem it, but the law has certain stipulations for consent, and as such, as the fact show, diminished capacity to make such judgments due to the chemical influence of a significant quantity is the basis for a lack of consent in this situation.
      On a more personal note, though I havent seen the actual footage of the case, I can imagine that police have reviewed the footage, and stills, and can note from them the level of capacity of this girl. Seeing how incredibly appalled, and adamant they are about her truthfulness, and the high profile of this case, I dont think they would broadcast videos on CTV, or statements that might be proven premature at a later date.

      13 7Rating: +6

      Bob R.

      Sep 21, 2010 at 9:55pm

      @ Bellanouva: "the idea that despite witnesses that do corroborate her story, and physical evidence, people still disbelieve this girl is absurd"....I didn't realize there were any witnesses that corroborated. Please include a link as I have only read and of those that don't; and as far as physical evidence, the police have stated they haven't even received the toxicology report (btw, good luck finding traces of GHB 7 days after the fact) It's incredible irresponsible for the police and media to be making these public pronouncements at such an early stage of an investigation especially when there are conflicting accounts of what happened. This mass pile on is almost as despicable as a gang rape...there's a reason we say the accused are presumed innocent until proven guilty. Let's act as though it were true and wait until ALL the facts are known before potentially destroying peoples' lives.

      12 6Rating: +6

      John Smith

      Sep 21, 2010 at 9:59pm

      Part of the reason why the "Reasonable Doubt" group was created was to discuss alternative views of what may have happened at this rave because when it was done on the support group, members were accused of condoning rape, called sick, perverted, etc. and threatened with violence and other attacks.

      I've been mentioning the book, "To Kill a Mockingbird" by Harper Lee in this case. Like the townspeople in the book, everyone seems to want to lynch and attack the accused as well as those whom try to defend them before they are given due process and a chance to defend themselves.

      8 8Rating: 0