Lonely Planet travel guide eliminates editorial positions

    1 of 1 2 of 1

      For more than four decades, it’s served as a bible for countless backpackers roaming every corner of the globe.

      It was more than a guidebook. It was a source of comfort for young explorers. It didn’t just show the way to Ankor Wat and up Machu Pichu; it also led weary travellers down back alleys to cheap beds and new friends.

      In its early days, that was Lonely Planet’s secret to success. Other travel guides existed before Lonely Planet’s founding in 1972. But it carved out a niche catering to young people wandering the world on a shoestring. Its inclusion—emphasis, really—on low-end hostels made international travel more easily accessible to vagabonds, and in doing so, opened the doors on a community of like-minded free spirits.

      Sadly, the Lonely Planet guidebook series is reportedly no more, or at least not what it once was.

      “Lonely Planet has cut 100 jobs from its Melbourne HQ this afternoon, wielding the axe across its entire editorial department,” reads a report at the Australian. “All editorial staff including the iconic travel guide company’s writers, editors and cartographers were told by management today their positions had been made redundant.”

      There have long been a number of alternatives. Rough Guides, Foder’s, and Frommer’s, to name just three. And Lonely Planet was the target of many fair criticisms over the years. But it was the first to do budget guides for many less-travelled destinations, and long the most recognizable of the bunch

      The Australian goes on to quote a statement attributed to Lonely Planet, which is owned by the American billionaire Brad Kelly’s NC2 Media.

      “Announced to staff and contributors a series of changes to its operations in response to a challenging external environment and to position the company for continued success,” it reads. “These changes will enable Lonely Planet to be well positioned for ongoing success and investing in the future in line with our 40-year heritage.”

      Exactly what that position will look like remains to be seen. But as one unnamed source in the Australian article put it, “we're no longer in the business of content creation”.

      You can follow Travis Lupick on Twitter at twitter.com/tlupick.

      Comments

      6 Comments

      NEt 2.0

      Jul 18, 2013 at 4:04pm

      I get local info from locals via the Net.

      I don't need Aussies or Brits telling me about Africa, South America and Canada :).

      LW

      Jul 18, 2013 at 11:19pm

      No, but getting all the info from locals sure makes it harder to connect with other travelers. If you're missing out on that, you're missing out on a lot of fun and expense-sharing. The experience of traveling with other travelers, people you've just met and who are in a much closer frame of mind to you than locals, can be a blast, and you'll end up doing, seeing, and feeling a lot more than you would just by following the locals' advice. Lonely Planet has been valuable to people who are out for a life experience, not just an "authentic" local experience in a particular place.

      NotJustA

      Jul 19, 2013 at 1:50am

      Net2.0, have a look at where Lonely Planet's authors come from: you'll find South Americans, Africans and -yes! - Canadians!
      And of course it's best to find out stuff from locals. Where do you think LP authors get their information?

      Alan Layton

      Jul 19, 2013 at 8:07am

      Why not get information from both the locals and good guide books. Locals can lead you to some real gems, but at the same time they may ignore the more popular sights that might be worth seeing. Either way, you can always have a great time, on a small budget, if you are in the right frame of mind.

      Jen

      Jul 19, 2013 at 3:08pm

      The problem is that if you're getting info purely from locals, it makes it difficult to find inexpensive lodging when one is traveling. I utilized Lonelyplanet guides basically for that reason--inexpensive, centrally located lodging. Plus, they're great for quickly finding out where useful things like drugstores are without having to ask 6 people.

      chris

      Jul 20, 2013 at 4:08am

      I gave up on Lonely Planet years ago (late 90s). Homogenous at best. There's this little thing called the Internet, which has eliminated the need to lug around an extra few pounds.