John Doyle's report slams B.C. government’s carbon offset strategy

    1 of 2 2 of 2

      A highly anticipated report from B.C.’s auditor general says the provincial government did not actually live up to its claim of becoming carbon neutral in 2010.

      John Doyle’s report, released today (March 27), focuses on a key part of the government’s strategy to achieve the objective that involved purchasing carbon offsets.

      The offsets are credits for greenhouse-gas reductions that can be exchanged from one organization to another.

      In his 34-page report, Doyle found most of the carbon offsets the province purchased to reach the 2010 goal lacked credibility.

      In particular, the audit looked at $6-million worth of offset purchases the Pacific Carbon Trust, a provincial Crown corporation, made from two major B.C. projects: the Darkwoods Forest Carbon project and the Encana Underbalanced Drilling project.

      Doyle determined there was no indication the purchase of those offsets was a necessary incentive for the projects to move forward.

      “Offsets can only be credible in British Columbia if, among other things, the revenue from their sale is the tipping point in moving forward on a project,” Doyle said in a news release.

      “It must be an incentive, not a subsidy, for the reduction of GHGs. However, neither project was able to demonstrate that the sale of offsets was needed for the project to be implemented.”

      Among his recommendations, Doyle calls for emission-reduction targets for individual public sector organizations, more rigorous review of offset purchases, and stronger oversight of whether offset purchases are credible.

      The B.C. government has accepted Doyle’s recommendations, saying improvements to the offset program are already under way. However, the province rejected the auditor general’s finding the government has not become carbon neutral.

      "British Columbia became the first carbon neutral government in North America in 2010 and is recognized as a world leader in climate action—I stand by our achievements," Environment Minister Terry Lake said in a news release.

      "The audit was limited in scope—only covering B.C.'s first year as a carbon neutral government and the first two offsets purchased by Pacific Carbon Trust—and does not reflect the changes made to B.C.'s offset system as the market has evolved."

      Meanwhile, the B.C. New Democrats said Doyle’s audit shows the government’s carbon-offset plan is deeply flawed.

      “The audit shows that the government took funds from cash-strapped school districts and hospitals to pay an oil and gas company to do a project they were going to do anyway,” environment critic Rob Fleming said in a news release.

      “While the auditor’s findings are significant, many British Columbians had already concluded that the way the B.C. Liberals configured the Pacific Carbon Trust made no sense.”

      Comments

      3 Comments

      Eve

      Mar 27, 2013 at 3:22pm

      Using our tax dollars, on the backs of our children, from the budgets of our hospitals, this government is trying to buy its way to carbon neutrality instead of looking for meaningful change that will actually impact the environment in a positive way! This is the height of crazy!

      Eric Doherty

      Mar 27, 2013 at 6:44pm

      If there is going to be a system that public sector has to pay into, it should go to reducing carbon emissions in the public sector. Giving the money to big oil and the like is crazy.

      I think the most important place to invest is in Schools. Young people should be able to see and experience the best in energy efficiency and renewable energy right in their schools. Things like bike racks and cycling lessons could also be funded.

      p lg

      Mar 27, 2013 at 9:55pm

      Last years BC Liberal government returned $140 million in tax credits to those frackin gas drilling companies in Northern BC and this year they are giving these same companies $120 million.

      Has the government ever thought of legislation to reduce GHG emissions like California did with the automobile industry in the last century?

      If you want to know more about the carbon offsets and credit scams go to:

      www.carbontradewatch.org