West End social-service providers scramble to help seniors face housing challenges

    1 of 2 2 of 2

      Donald Allison has helped low-income earners find affordable housing in Vancouver for more than 25 years. He told the Georgia Straight he never thought he would need the same kind of assistance.

      “And I’m not the only one in my building,” the retired chef and housing advocate said in a telephone interview. “Even though I’ve been here 20 years, soon I probably will have to move.”

      Allison explained that for many older West End residents, fixed incomes have remained stagnant while rents have significantly increased.

      “There are a lot of people who are really upset,” he said. “Not only are we going to have to leave the West End—which is a pretty great place for seniors—but we’ll be leaving the people we know. And no matter where you look in Vancouver, it’s hard to find a place. Where do we go?”

      Rev. Jim Smith told the Straight that the housing crunch for seniors is one of the primary reasons his church at the corner of Thurlow and Pendrell streets is developing its property to include 45 affordable housing units.

      “Our interest started with seniors getting screwed with renovictions,” he explained by phone. “We’re trying to help provide a place for people to age. You’ve got people who have been here for 50 years having to move out of the only neighbourhood they know.”

      Smith described Central Presbyterian Church as one of the busiest social-service providers in the neighbourhood. He revealed it will close for an estimated 18 months beginning this December.

      “The building is in use from 6 in the morning until 10 at night, seven days a week,” he said. “So we’re hoping to take the whole gang with us wherever we go.”

      Upon completion, the church will occupy the first three floors of a new 22-storey tower. In addition to 45 units subsidized for seniors, the complex will include 168 market-rate apartments. City council approved the site for rezoning and development on July 15.

      Upon completion sometime in 2016, the church at the corner of Thurlow and Pendrell streets will be replaced with a 22-story tower with a place of worship occupying the three lower floors.
      Travis Lupick

      According to a 2012 “community profile” prepared by the city, 13 percent of West End residents are 65 or older and 34 percent are between the ages of 40 and 64. The report notes the proportion of seniors may increase as that second group of residents grows older.

      B.C. Housing refused to grant an interview.

      Spencer Chandra Herbert, NDP MLA for Vancouver–West End, told the Straight that since he was first elected to the legislature in 2008 he’s repeatedly written to Housing Minister Rich Coleman about the challenges seniors face.

      In April of this year, B.C. Housing finally provided for small increases to rent-assistance cheques offered through the Shelter Assistance for Elderly Renters (SAFER) program, Chandra Herbert noted. But he said that was the first increase since 2007, which means even revised SAFER allowances remain behind rent increases.

      “Having the rent go up every year while your income stays the same, that often means residents have to make choices like lowering the amount of money in their food budget in order to put it into housing,” he said.

      According to an email supplied by B.C. Housing CEO Shayne Ramsay, more than 2,800 Vancouver households received SAFER assistance during the 2013 fiscal year. With the April program change, the average monthly payment increased from $150 to $190.

      Vision Vancouver councillor Tim Stevenson argued that a plan that city hall adopted in November 2013 was designed to protect and add to existing rental stock to accommodate the 7,000 to 10,000 additional people projected to join the neighbourhood over the next 30 years.

      However, the long-time West End resident added that the combination of aging buildings, renovations, and rent increases is “always a problem”.

      Sharon Isaak, a seniors community planner for United Way of the Lower Mainland, said that so-called renovictions are less common than they were in the late 2000s. But she added that there remains “a fear” in the neighbourhood.

      “People don’t think that they’re going to be able to stay in the West End and age in place in their community,” she said. “They fear that the landlord is going to try and up their rent.”

      Follow Travis Lupick on TwitterFacebook, and Instagram.

      Comments

      6 Comments

      More details needed.

      Aug 27, 2014 at 1:39pm

      Housing reportage is frequently hard to fully understand due to the lack of hard numbers provided. Is it illegal to give numbers instead of vagaries like "affordable" and "market rate"?

      Charlene

      Aug 27, 2014 at 7:12pm

      Could the west end be getting more expensive to live because of the younger "beautiful"people & "attractive" couples with money that aren't even part of the LGBTQ community are moving here from the suburbs?
      I know that may sound too far fetched, but it's just a thought & maybe something to think about.

      Westender

      Aug 28, 2014 at 10:17am

      Why don't people just move into the "affordable market rental housing" that Vision Vancouver rammed through the approval process at 1401 Comox Street / 1051 Broughton Street? Rentals in the new building start at $1700 month. Funny that the Report to Council on this project said that one bedroom units would range from $1128 to $1465 per month. On top of that, the developer added a wall to each of the 380 square foot studio units and now calls them "one bedrooms." I'm not holding my breath for anyone from City Hall to follow-up on whether the developer is operating the building in accordance with their promises to the public at the rezoning stage. But in case they do, here's what City Staff said the project would include in their Report to Council: "The development includes a variety of types of rental units including studios, one-bedrooms, 2-bedrooms, and 3-bedroom townhouses, which the applicant estimates will rent for a range of $2.00 to $2.96 per square foot per month, with specific rent levels varying depending on location within the building and unit size. This translates into the following monthly rents ranging from $860 to $1,209 for a studio, $1,128 to $1,465 for a 1-bedroom, $1,611 to $1,988 for a 2-bedroom and $2,320 to $2,541 for a 3-bedroom townhouse."

      Community

      Aug 28, 2014 at 12:39pm

      This is endemic of Vancouver as a whole. Wages have not risen, food, transportation, housing costs are climbing. People are finding it tough. It is also marginalizing our most vulnerable - the people who actually built the WE into the neighbourhood it is. It is Very important to realize that a flourishing city includes young, old, rich, middle class & poor. It is this mixture that keeps a city healthy & vibrant.
      One need only look at Coal Harbor and realize how the lack of diversity is not working. It is a ghost town of tourists on the Seawall and absent condo owners. It is pretty, but lacks soul.

      Liar, Liar

      Aug 28, 2014 at 6:24pm

      So Vision Vancouver, including Tim Stephenson, approved a development that said studio and one bedroom apartments would rent from $860 to $1,465. Instead, the units built by Vision Vancouver's favoured developer - Westbank - are renting for $1,500 up to $2,000....and apparently the city doesn't give a damn. On top of that, this is the project that received a waiver of $1.7 million in development charges - a deficiency that needs to made up by taxpayers. AND the Mayor's office has the gall today to publish a media release on their successes in creating "affordable housing"!? This group is just shameless.

      Victor

      Aug 29, 2014 at 2:14pm

      Westender thank you for the facts.

      Liar Liar you are so right too. Wasn't it Stephenson who told a packed West End crowd prior to the last Election - "there will be no new towers in the West End if you elect me"? Whatever happened to that promise? He voted for everything his gang proposed.

      First there was Maxines/Bidwell St and then the Church/Comox St along with the soon to be built Beach Towers intrusion and abomination in the community. None of these have created "affordable rental housing". "Affordable" being defined by Cllr Jang as whatever one can afford?

      It is astounding that anyone prints the Vision spin anymore. One only has to look at the actual real rental rates after the have given taxpayers money to their pals to realize what a load of BS they feed the media.