Idling while Canada burns: lessons we can learn from First Nations

During last summer’s heat wave, a big delivery truck pulled up in front of the construction site across the street from my house. It stood idling for at least 15 minutes before I ventured outside and headed over to the cab where the driver and his friend were playing their music very loud. “Can you please turn off your engine?” I asked politely when they finally rolled down the window. “There’s a law against idling in Vancouver.” The driver’s anger shot up. “There’s a law against everything in Vancouver!” he retorted. Obviously, he had to drive a long way to deliver his load and it hadn’t been a good day. I chose my words carefully. “They’ve decided to ask people not to idle because of climate change. You know, leaving a better world for our grandchildren.” The look on his face could have sunk a ship. No one had spoken to this guy about his grandchildren, at least not recently. He turned off his motor. I said thank you and walked away.


Do you support the Idle No More movement?

Yes 88%
363 votes
No 11%
45 votes
Undecided 1%
6 votes


The First Nations concept of seven generations—of leaving the world as good, or better, than you found it for the children to come—is an old one. It was well entrenched in their society when Frenchman Jacques Cartier landed in what is now Quebec in 1535. It’s been almost five centuries since then and now over 30 million people live in Kanata—a Huron-Iroquois word for “village”. While on the surface Canada looks like a successful First World nation, underneath this veneer there are many inconvenient truths. Former Prime Minister Paul Martin didn’t mince words when he said, “We have never admitted to ourselves that we were, and still are, a colonial power.” In a recent interview, Martin also made the point that, as Postmedia News puts it, “Canada is starving its First Nations of the funding they need for proper health care and education and, even today, is fixated on assimilating aboriginals into a culture that is not theirs.” He also argued that the “Harper government is making serious mistakes by scaling back environmental protection,” according to that article.

The colonial world view that landed on Canada’s shore centuries ago has been highly destructive for both the natural environment and the resident First Nations, who had lived in a remarkably sustainable fashion up to that time. The predominant view that “man is the centre of the world”, which replaced this, has since then recklessly clear-cut much of the natural capital endowment—forests, coal, oil and gas, minerals, fish, and countless other animal species. It has fouled air, water, and soil, and these destructive forces show no signs of slowing down. After the First Nations offered knowledge to the original settlers so they could survive on the land, the dominant classes in the new settler society, who profited from the exploitation of these resources, proceeded to marginalize and assimilate these indigenous people and blot out their rich and valuable culture. And, as Cree singer Buffy Sainte-Marie says, “it’s still going on here today”. The recent passing of Bill C-45 by the Conservative government of Canada, which is seen as further eroding First Nations rights, is just the latest insult in a long line of ill-considered and unconscionable enactments.

The label “Idle No More” describes a grassroots movement which has risen up in the past few weeks. It has been supported by thousands of First Nations people, along with many of their fellow Canadians, to protest present-day government policies. They will no longer stand idly by as everything that they believe in is once again threatened. Enough is enough! At the same time, Attawapiskat Chief Theresa Spence has been on a hunger strike since December 11 to call attention to her people’s issues, and mainstream media has taken a long time to respond positively to her actions.

Idle No More protesters are also very concerned with the recent, outrageous gutting of environmental protection. First, the omnibus Bill C-38 passed in June and, among other things, weakened the power of the Canadian Fisheries Act, a 144-year-old piece of legislation designed to protect fish habitat. This bill also vastly diminished the powers of environmental protection and assessment which have been slowly building since Confederation. The federal government then cut staff at the Department of Fisheries and Oceans. With the passing of Bill C-45 in December, the 130-year-old Navigable Waters Protection Act that protects the majority of Canada’s water systems has been shrunk to a shadow of its former self. And at the same time Canada now has the dubious honour of being the first country in the world to withdraw from the 1997 Kyoto Accord on climate change.

After Bills C-38 and C-45 passed in Parliament, many Canadians continued on with their regular lives. But others, especially First Nations people, took notice that these bills intend on further degrading the foundation of environmental stewardship and indigenous rights in this country. The present-day government of Canada is acting as if the existing laws which provide protection for the rights of fish, water, and First Nations are completely expendable. That is because these safeguards get in the way of their obsession with continued “economic” growth—essentially the further destruction of more of our natural capital endowment for the sake of short-term, present-day financial gains.

The Harper government’s official response to Idle No More and Chief Spence’s hunger strike has been that they are already working to address aboriginal concerns. Julie Vaux, a spokesperson for Harper, cited the “historic gathering of the Crown and First Nations this past January”. She added, “Since then, the government has been working with First Nations leadership to make progress in several areas, most notably education and infrastructure on reserve.”

But what kind of “progress” have they achieved if Bill C-45 is universally seen by First Nations as further degrading their rights? This strongly suggests that the underlying intention of this government is to continue as a “colonial power”. It appears they want to keep pacifying and marginalizing aboriginal people so they will not get in the way of continued resource development. But not all Canadians support this “industrial economic growth at all costs” objective. Watch these protests grow bigger and stronger as more people recognize the unfairness and absurdity of what the government is attempting to achieve.

The word “idle” is a fitting label for the outrage that spawned this movement. In “fossil fuel-speak”, idling represents everything that is obscene about humankind’s historically voracious and presently expanding fossil fuel consumption. Idling is sitting in a vehicle running your engine because you need your air conditioning in summer, heat in winter, or you’re just too lazy to turn it off regardless of how much it poisons the air. Too many people still drive their cars thoughtlessly and consume as if they are modern day “emperors”—as Andrew Nikiforuk describes them in his new book about the tragedy of excess fossil fuel consumption, The Energy of Slaves: Oil and the New Servitude. We are using up as much energy to support our shopping addictions or getting in our car and fetching takeout for dinner as historical monarchs did with the muscle power of a host of slaves.

The Conservative government’s continued undying support for fossil fuel production and the expansion of its gargantuan and intrusive infrastructure is killing our beautiful planet and ruining it for future generations. But this is the primary force that drives them—their belief in an outdated model for a human economy which they think Canadians need and want. Paul Martin envisions an alternate route. He says: “The first thing that we have to do is put a price on carbon. Because that’s a real cost and it has to be involved in every aspect of public policy, certainly every decision a government or the private sector takes.”

Thank you, First Nations of Canada for gathering to rise up against evil forces of relentless industrial expansion. Thank you for inviting us to your peaceful protests where there are friendly people singing, drumming, and dancing and sharing wise words. Thank you for showing us, as you have so many times in the past, what community and environmental stewardship looks like. We’re supporting you all the way!

Comments (22) Add New Comment
todays news on global was a sad version of the idle no more issues well written !!!!!
Rating: -1
This is Canada. What can be achieved at the 40th parallel and further south is not possible north of 54. We do need to brainstorm solutions, but they have to be specific to us, and our life situations in the Great White North. We don't all live in Lotus Land.
Rating: -6
**49th parallel**
Rating: +26
Pete Couchi
Miigwech (thank you) Celia Brauer for your very truthful words. Just when I believe there is no hope for non indigenous to see past their privilage, someone has to remind me that there is still hope.
Rating: +10
Pete I don't know what part of Canada you're from but where I'm from there's almost NO ONE who is "non-idigenous". This is the west boyo, and we are of mixed race. Scratch a Scot or a francophone, and you'll find granny was Cree, or Ojibwa. It's best if you read what the Idle No More founders have asked, which is peaceful protest, and I think that includes, no divisive talk.
Rating: +19
the only divisive talk I see on this comment thread is under the heading ghillie
thank you for this piece, Idle no More is sorely needed
Rating: -18
Ghtaillie, I agree with your comment about no divisive talk 100%.
That being said, if you peruse the comment sections of other news articles you will better understand what is meant by Petes comment, and the frustrations possibly diving it. Some members of the non-native sector seem to be blind to the real premise of the 'Idle No More' movement, thus bringing forth a them v. us mentality. This is tragic, seeing as the root of this movement is something most Canadians can appreciate. You are very right though. Now is the time to ally together, rather than making any one person or group feel a sense of alienation.
Rating: +15
Thank you for this article. I have shared it (hopefully) far and wide. I believe we all need to focus on what's important. It doesn't matter where we are from or what ethnicity we are. People around the world are banding together to support this cause, and it's nice to see. It would be even better if PM Harper would open his eyes and take notice.

The only divisive comment I see on this page is ghillie calling Pete "boy" (or "boyo", which is probably a typo). I find that offensive.

Regardless, I love this article. One of the best I've seen. Thanks again!
Rating: -5
Ron Clement
Shut down the tar sands. Shut down the uranium mines, gold mines,diamond mines. Stop drilling for oil & gas. Lay off all the first nations folks that work there. Put them back on welfare and let the taxpaying Canadian public pay somemore. Some where there is a balance, protesting will not get the job done. Working together one on one face to face is the only way we can solve these problems. Everyone is yipping at Harper, but I dont see anyone coming up wirh an alternate solution!! Everyone says he's doing it wrong. Noone is offering an alternate solution. NDP & Liberals just chritisize, no solutions there. Think about this' The tar sands has been dumping oil into the northern Alberts rivers and creeks since BEFORE first nations arrived. They were the first people to see the potenal. waterproofing boats, making good fires, hmm, wild life and the fish flourished, you just didnt drink the water that had a rainbow in it. Now, the whiteman comes along and sticks a shovel in it and all hell breaks loose!!! Food for thought.
Rating: -25
James G. Learning
Indeed a fine article, great summary of Harper destruction, and illigeal use of the Mega Bill, and the indeginous peoples being fed up with the gutting of the environmental processes. As of yet there is acknowledgement of all being peacful. Should Harper not intercede before Chief Spense dies, there will probably be an esclation this man will regret, and a great country will get another black eye, under his watch
Rating: -6
Michelle W
I'm sorry but who was here before the first nations arrived?
Rating: +6
I'm confused by this article because it seems to suggest that there is some kind of necessary connection between environmentalism, human rights, and native compensation. You CAN be strongly pro-environment, respect universal human rights, and not buy into the continuous victim-rhetoric of Native peoples and the litany of "colonialism."
Rating: -4
Ralph Fulber a.k.a. 'cleesemeek'
Specifically to Ron's comments because this issue needs to be expanded upon. I move to Britannia Beach and became an activist concerned with mitigating the 'worst point source of mineral contamination in North America' and making the lands my home. The Britannia Creek had naturally high levels of copper prior to the mining activity. There were no salmon in the creek pre contact. Our mining activities aggrevate these natural conditions and to make a statement about how the tar sands contaminated the rivers before entire moonscapes were exposed and the changes became exponential is a poor strategic argument. Don't think black or white here. Every tribe utilizes resources. We need to to rethink scale, measure and impact. Make it fair and sustainable. Let's learn from each other with an understanding of Tsawalk, that all is one and we swim in the same waters and breath the same air. As pointed out in this great article, we all have families and a concern for the children's futures too. Idle no more. chuu
Rating: -2
Peter White
Did Canada's aboriginal people live up to their environmental ideals? In A Green History of The World, author Clive Ponting claims they pushed many species to extinction, and that the North American environment had declined by the time the white man arrived. Limited numbers and primitive technology meant a slow decline compared to recent times. In power, humans rarely resist the exploitation of nature, regardless of race.
Rating: +13
Martin Dunphy
Peter White:
Respectfully, I will submit that Ponting was referring to mainly a time period covering the first arrival of Homo sapiens sapiens to North America, probably more than 30,000 years ago, up to about 8,000 BC--the beginning of the post ice-age interregnum, so to speak, that represented what we now think of as the introduction of First Nations peoples to this continent from Asia.
Your point about humans in general stands on its own merit, of course.
Rating: -13
earthy earl
bunch of bunk if you ask me. just another reason for deadbeat aboriginals to keep their agenda in the headlines while disrupting the lives of others. when i see them commuting by canoe and horseback (and perhaps paying taxes) i'll consider their issues relevant.
Rating: +4
As someone who interacts with First Nations members almost daily, my view is that they need to stop blaming and start working seriously toward building better lives for their people. All bands are not the same; some function WELL. Others show evidence of being terribly dysfunctional, with many of their children in foster care. I don't think the money is the issue, because reserves have health centres and offers of gov't help in managing, if needed. The leadership of bands should be held accountable by their members.
Rating: +5
“leaving the world as good, or better, than you found it for the children to come” – one wonders how that works given the high incidence of fetal alcohol spectrum disorder seen in native communities across Canada.
“Canada is starving its First Nations of the funding they need for proper health care and education and, even today, is fixated on assimilating aboriginals into a culture that is not theirs.” – The recent audit done on Attawapiskat demonstrates quite clearly how well natives manage the funding they get from the taxpayers of Canada. As for assimilating them into a culture; here’s a news flash for you – culture is an evolving process, and the modern world is quickly assimilating everyone into a global culture.

Perhaps the authour should do a little less wallowing in liberal self-loathing, and a little more objective journalism.
Rating: +5
Dean S
Am I the only one who finds the term "non-native" offensive and derogatory??
Rating: -3
I've learned a lot from the First Nations. First, beware those who tell the world they speak for you because we happen to have the same shape eyes. They are usually trying to get a grant.

Second, get a practical education. The library is the best and it's free, but apprenticeships, mentoring, and plain old school works too.

Third, don't let your elders drag you down. You can never be fully free of them, and I guess you have to love them, but you are under no obligation to like them, and you don't owe them a thing other than the usual civility and courtesy you would give a total stranger. In no way are they to shame you.

Fourth, resist labels. We are born men and women, and right or left handed, but generally speaking we should resist predetermination. If you are gay, straight, bi, geek, jock, top, bottom, zealot, atheist, technophile, or pagan, you deserve the respect that YOU have earned. You earn nothing by being born over a particular piece of land. Anyone who tells you different is angling for a grant.
Rating: +4


Add new comment
To prevent automated spam submissions leave this field empty.