Commentary | Olympics

Deborah Folka: Who knew women couldn't ski jump in the Winter Olympics?

American Lindsey Van, current and first world champion in women's ski jumping, celebrates her historic victory with silver medalist Anette Sagen of Norway last year in the Czech Republic.

Deborah Folka.

By Deborah Folka

Who knew women were not allowed to ski jump in the Olympics? Certainly not me when two years ago I was asked to coordinate the communications around a lawsuit launched in Vancouver to demand this gender imbalance be rectified.

We didn’t win the lawsuit, though the lower court judge was clear in her finding of discrimination against women ski jumpers. But after the two years and three levels of court, it is apparent this was not a wrong that could be righted through the application of law, an appeal to common sense, or under the glare of publicity. There has to be a strong political will to protect equality—something I, perhaps naively, believed was a primary Canadian value.

The 15 elite women ski jumpers who were my clients—some as young as 15—are all disciplined, courageous athletes. Alongside their male teammates, they train rigorously; they compete with focus; they develop skills, technique, and knowledge about their sport; and they sacrifice school time, normal social lives, and any other hobbies on the altar of elite athletics with the hope of one day going to the Olympics. It’s not a given, of course. But it’s the dream.

The Olympic goal seemed within their grasp in 2006 when the International Ski Federation recommended 114-1 to the International Olympic Committee that women’s ski jumping be added as a new event. The men have been jumping since 1924—it’s one of the original winter sports in the modern-day Olympics. Whole new sports, like snowboard cross and skier cross, were recently added to the Olympic roster with fewer athletes and fewer countries than women’s ski jumping. It was time.

Views on the Olympics

Chris Shaw: Why resist the 2010 Winter Olympics in Vancouver?

Am Johal: The 2010 Olympics have been an attack on civil society in Vancouver

Virginia Greene: 2010 Olympics will be biggest advertisement ever for B.C.

Ivan Doumenc: 2010 Winter Olympics will be Vancouver's demise

Marla Renn: Attempts to silence dissent won't stifle resistance to 2010 Olympics

Joyce Murray: The triumphs and challenges of the 2010 Olympics and Paralympics

Philip Boyle and Kevin D. Haggerty: Olympic-size questions about surveillance and privacy

Peter Julian: Corporate Olympics need to return to sporting roots

Jane Sterk: The inconvenient legacy of Vancouver's 2010 Olympics

Alvin Singh: Social legacy of Vancouver Olympics won’t be what was promised

Kathy Corrigan: B.C. government should be upfront about real cost of 2010 Olympics

Dean Skoreyko: Civil rights should not be traded away for 2010 Olympics

Garry John and Maude Barlow: 2010 Olympics will leave legacy of social, environmental destruction

Joyce Arthur: Facts and fictions about sex trafficking and Vancouver's 2010 Olympics

Gord Hill: Why protest Vancouver's 2010 Olympics?

David Eby: Looking forward to civil liberties threats during the 2010 Olympics

Maureen Bader: Olympic security budget will create a big brother legacy

Laura Track: Downtown Eastside residents lose out in the 2010 Olympics

But the IOC said no. And Canada said nothing.

Our leadership has been strikingly mute on this topic. Only a handful of MPs and MLAs have publicly supported the women ski jumpers, and all who have are members of opposition parties. When politicians of any stripe and at any level were asked by reporters about the issue, every one of them said they supported the inclusion of the women but... That “but” would invariably be followed by the feeble—indeed embarrassing—excuse that “it’s up to the IOC and we can’t do anything”.

I can only speak for myself (well, okay, and 73 percent of the Canadian population found by a national survey to be in support of the women ski jumpers), but I want the leaders of my country to stand up to foreign entities who use my tax dollars to put on a big event and then won’t let women set foot on something built for that event. In a marvellous irony, the current record holder for the Whistler normal hill is Lindsey Van, the 2009 women’s ski jump world champion. A bunch of male ski jumpers from all over the world, many with abilities far inferior to Van’s, will compete on those jumps next month, but not her.

The lawsuit launched by the women ski jumpers did not cost taxpayers a dime. Davis LLP did the legal work pro bono, and I provided the communications counsel for free. In the latter stages, as the issue caught fire and more and more support flooded in, Torys LLP and Osler, Hoskin & Harcourt LLP also donated their time and expertise to the fray. We had relentless and unfaltering leadership from Deedee Corradini, former mayor of Salt Lake City, long-time Olympic insider, and now president of Women’s Ski Jumping USA, a small not-for-profit foundation. We also enjoyed virtually uncritical endorsement in the popular media’s coverage of the story. Pretty much anybody who bothered to glance at the facts shrugged and said it was a no-brainer: the women should be in the Olympics and it was nothing but a tempest in a teapot. I agree.

So why didn’t common sense prevail? Why will Vancouver 2010 not be celebrated as the first gender-equal Olympics? Why is the shameful whiff of discrimination going to linger instead?

It all comes down to leadership. The Vancouver Olympic organizing committee’s leadership could have stood up to the IOC long ago, preventing the waste of all the time, money, and effort they spent fighting us. Vanoc CEO John Furlong could have told IOC president Jacques Rogge: “That’s not the way it’s done in Canada, Jacques. In Canada, people enjoy the same privileges regardless of race, sex, orientation, or beliefs. It’s our house, we put on the party, and we get to set the rules. No smoking, please wipe your feet when you come in and, oh yes, both girls and boys are welcome.”

Deborah Folka is a communications consultant in Vancouver.

Comments

webbgerl
Hello all you Olympic supporters, there is no hidden message here. It is a clear case of discrimination. Personally, this infuriates me, and I have been against Olympic spending since the start. At least if the women's ski jump had been allowed to compete, it would have been at least a little bit worth it.
 
Shirky
I actually kindof agree that until a sport reaches a critical mass, it should not be an olympic sport. Otherwise you have a situation where anyone in the sport who is 'pretty good' gets to go to the olympics. Maybe that is an exaggeration of this situation, but I think in a general sense thats what we're looking at with Women's Ski Jump.
 
Beth
Great article. It disgusts me that these amazingly talented girls and women cannot compete in this event and make us proud with their great shows of athleticism, discipline, hard work, and tenacity, soaring fabulously and at times almost horizontally through the air. It disgusts me equally that while the Olympics nixes female athletes, women are still welcome to come to Vancouver from all over Canada to get horizontal work as prostitutes during the Games. What message is that sending? Crap. I'm going to a movie now. Escapism is all that helps me with such blatant sexism as this.
Beth
 
Maurice Cardinal
I'm surprised by the lack of solidarity among Olympic athletes, especially male ski jumpers. Where are you guys?

The IOC has Olympic athletes so intimidated they don't have the balls to stand up for what is right.

This is gender discrimination pure and simple.

 
s shaw #1
Ms. Folka presents a good case, great that she and a major downtown law firm donated their time, etc. etc. What the young women who ski jump need to do now is work to get other young women involved in the sport and work at raising profile of the sport so that the IOC is forced to pay attention. Now that glare of publicity has died down I am skeptical that these women and their supporters have the focus and determination to do the long slog of behind-the-scenes grunt work ahead.
 
Oldtimer
Thanks for the timely reminder about the systemic sexism that still pervades the IOC and the generally spineless nature of our ruling federal MINORITY government and VANOC. Instead of a great opportunity to showcase social progress and equality, we now have another example of the how the Old Boys set the rules.
Shame on the IOC and to VANOC for agreeing to terms where IOC rules trump a sovereign countries charter of rights and freedoms. I hope that there are peaceful protests at the Ski jumping site to remind viewers (for of course that is what the Olympics is substantially about) of the missing female athletes.
 
Moe Szysslak
Hmm. Would the Females be allowed to compete againts the Males? Is that allowed? I remember in 88 in calgary Eddie the Eagle got to jump, great guy, but he sucked in ski jumping. Is this a no to Female Ski Jumping competition, or is it no to Females competing in a Ski Jumping Competition. I thought we lived in an age and place where we didnt take this kinda crap. Oh yeah when I went to Fit Ladys Gym I was rejected....
 
miguel
I've heard that the snowboard freestyle event will be replaced with downhill waterskiing.
Miguel
 
miguel
Moe, Right after Eddie the Eagle the IOC banned amateurs from amateur sports.
Miguel
 
LoL
Here we go again.

A bunch of entitled children playing the sex card.

This was never about women or the feminist leeches trying to get their way, it was about rules.

Don't like them? Promote the sport and get the numbers you need.

Quit guilt-tripping Dad.
 
Ren
Hey Deborah,

I'm feeling my oats after winning a parking ticket dispute....I want to now enroll into McGill law school.

I don't have the marks, or even prior university education (just some community college), but I've seen what it's like to win in a court-room and I think I'm ready....

Can you help.me circumvent the admisions process at McGill, since you're such a believer in circumventing set criterias that were designed to ensure integrity.

The only thing is that since I'm a white male, we'll have to come up with a 'card' to play, that works with the Charter.

But maybe the white male card might work, since your work with the ski jumping girls taught us that there's absolutely no women participating in the Olympics.....except for: various other forms of skiiing, hockey, biathlon (my word!!! guns!!!!), luge, skelton, bobslead, speedskating, etc....

If not McGill, I'm actually also thinking of hiring a law firm to sue the local concert promoter for not allowing me, after 2 years of lessons, to go up on stage with AC-DC and play a set with the boys......They won't allow me so I think going after the concert promoter would work....what do you think?

 
total case of discrimination
also why isn't there a mens synchronized swimming event in the summer olympics, ive splashed around in a pool before and just because i've never organized a world cup or ever had an event to judge who's the best in the world it would benefit me to let me and some of my friends compete at the next summer games
 
Randy Chatterjee
You did not have to sit in court as I did to hear the arguments and remark at the dedication of a dozen world-class athletes whose devotion to their sport was proven by their willingness to sit through days of BC Supreme Court and BC Court of Appeal hearings after spending years readying themselves for this game to end all games, where sportspersonship seems sorely lacking.

My hat is off to Justice Anne Rowles for her findings of fact on the issue of discrimination against these women. Gender-based discrimination is illegal in Canada, as in all the countries whence these jumpers hail. Only on a questionable technicality of jurisdiction did BC's courts fail to uphold one of Canada's most important laws.

Four years ago, the International Ski Federation--the world governing body of the sport--voted almost unanimously to recommend that 130 registered international female ski jumpers from 16 countries be granted the right to compete in the Olympics. The depth of competition among these women surpasses many Olympic sports and some of these women jump farther than many of their male counterparts, and with more style.
 
DRW
Not having a womens jump event is really stupid. So many things about the OH--limp-icks are really stupid.

Time to end it for a hundred years or so and try again "latter".
 
Allan
This issue has nothing to do with jumping skills, sexual discrimination or the law.
If the jumping ladies had directed their efforts into satisfying the long-standing and well-founded Olympic entry requirements instead of pushing the old rerun emotional arguments in a time and money wasting court action, they would not only be competing and but would also have the respect of the community. Thank heaven our courts have maintained their objectivity.
 
I can't believe women
Who support the Olympics decision to discriminate against women and support the event by running with a lite that hurts like hell. Just imagine missing out on skiing down slopes that are more like mud slides and floods that close the roads as I hold my own vision of an event that can go to H.ll as no need to venture out just lite your own Calderon as no crime in that.
 
rob
Give me a break Only Canad and the United States have any meaningful participation in the sport. its like baseball in the summer Olympics or womans hockey theres so little competition whats the point
 
 
[Comments Disclaimer]
Post a comment
· Use your real name to have your comment considered for publication in print.
· URLs and email addresses will be automatically turned into links.