Deborah Folka: Who knew women couldn't ski jump in the Winter Olympics?
By Deborah Folka
Who knew women were not allowed to ski jump in the Olympics? Certainly not me when two years ago I was asked to coordinate the communications around a lawsuit launched in Vancouver to demand this gender imbalance be rectified.
We didn’t win the lawsuit, though the lower court judge was clear in her finding of discrimination against women ski jumpers. But after the two years and three levels of court, it is apparent this was not a wrong that could be righted through the application of law, an appeal to common sense, or under the glare of publicity. There has to be a strong political will to protect equality—something I, perhaps naively, believed was a primary Canadian value.
The 15 elite women ski jumpers who were my clients—some as young as 15—are all disciplined, courageous athletes. Alongside their male teammates, they train rigorously; they compete with focus; they develop skills, technique, and knowledge about their sport; and they sacrifice school time, normal social lives, and any other hobbies on the altar of elite athletics with the hope of one day going to the Olympics. It’s not a given, of course. But it’s the dream.
The Olympic goal seemed within their grasp in 2006 when the International Ski Federation recommended 114-1 to the International Olympic Committee that women’s ski jumping be added as a new event. The men have been jumping since 1924—it’s one of the original winter sports in the modern-day Olympics. Whole new sports, like snowboard cross and skier cross, were recently added to the Olympic roster with fewer athletes and fewer countries than women’s ski jumping. It was time.
Views on the Olympics
Chris Shaw: Why resist the 2010 Winter Olympics in Vancouver?
Am Johal: The 2010 Olympics have been an attack on civil society in Vancouver
Virginia Greene: 2010 Olympics will be biggest advertisement ever for B.C.
Ivan Doumenc: 2010 Winter Olympics will be Vancouver's demise
Marla Renn: Attempts to silence dissent won't stifle resistance to 2010 Olympics
Joyce Murray: The triumphs and challenges of the 2010 Olympics and Paralympics
Philip Boyle and Kevin D. Haggerty: Olympic-size questions about surveillance and privacy
Peter Julian: Corporate Olympics need to return to sporting roots
Jane Sterk: The inconvenient legacy of Vancouver's 2010 Olympics
Alvin Singh: Social legacy of Vancouver Olympics won’t be what was promised
Kathy Corrigan: B.C. government should be upfront about real cost of 2010 Olympics
Dean Skoreyko: Civil rights should not be traded away for 2010 Olympics
Garry John and Maude Barlow: 2010 Olympics will leave legacy of social, environmental destruction
Joyce Arthur: Facts and fictions about sex trafficking and Vancouver's 2010 Olympics
Gord Hill: Why protest Vancouver's 2010 Olympics?
David Eby: Looking forward to civil liberties threats during the 2010 Olympics
Maureen Bader: Olympic security budget will create a big brother legacy
Laura Track: Downtown Eastside residents lose out in the 2010 Olympics





Follow us on Twitter
Like us on Facebook
Comments
Beth
The IOC has Olympic athletes so intimidated they don't have the balls to stand up for what is right.
This is gender discrimination pure and simple.
Shame on the IOC and to VANOC for agreeing to terms where IOC rules trump a sovereign countries charter of rights and freedoms. I hope that there are peaceful protests at the Ski jumping site to remind viewers (for of course that is what the Olympics is substantially about) of the missing female athletes.
Miguel
Miguel
A bunch of entitled children playing the sex card.
This was never about women or the feminist leeches trying to get their way, it was about rules.
Don't like them? Promote the sport and get the numbers you need.
Quit guilt-tripping Dad.
I'm feeling my oats after winning a parking ticket dispute....I want to now enroll into McGill law school.
I don't have the marks, or even prior university education (just some community college), but I've seen what it's like to win in a court-room and I think I'm ready....
Can you help.me circumvent the admisions process at McGill, since you're such a believer in circumventing set criterias that were designed to ensure integrity.
The only thing is that since I'm a white male, we'll have to come up with a 'card' to play, that works with the Charter.
But maybe the white male card might work, since your work with the ski jumping girls taught us that there's absolutely no women participating in the Olympics.....except for: various other forms of skiiing, hockey, biathlon (my word!!! guns!!!!), luge, skelton, bobslead, speedskating, etc....
If not McGill, I'm actually also thinking of hiring a law firm to sue the local concert promoter for not allowing me, after 2 years of lessons, to go up on stage with AC-DC and play a set with the boys......They won't allow me so I think going after the concert promoter would work....what do you think?
My hat is off to Justice Anne Rowles for her findings of fact on the issue of discrimination against these women. Gender-based discrimination is illegal in Canada, as in all the countries whence these jumpers hail. Only on a questionable technicality of jurisdiction did BC's courts fail to uphold one of Canada's most important laws.
Four years ago, the International Ski Federation--the world governing body of the sport--voted almost unanimously to recommend that 130 registered international female ski jumpers from 16 countries be granted the right to compete in the Olympics. The depth of competition among these women surpasses many Olympic sports and some of these women jump farther than many of their male counterparts, and with more style.
Time to end it for a hundred years or so and try again "latter".
If the jumping ladies had directed their efforts into satisfying the long-standing and well-founded Olympic entry requirements instead of pushing the old rerun emotional arguments in a time and money wasting court action, they would not only be competing and but would also have the respect of the community. Thank heaven our courts have maintained their objectivity.