Bill C-45 targets foreign exotic dancers, but could also affect caregivers

    1 of 1 2 of 1

      A bill that makes it tougher to hire foreign exotic dancers will also make it harder for live-in caregivers and other temporary workers to come to Canada.

      Lawyer Richard Kurland, a Vancouver immigration-policy analyst, says it doesn’t make sense why the Conservatives reintroduced the proposed legislation after a previous version didn’t pass in the last session of Parliament.

      “Logic means you’ve seen evidence there’s a problem, [and] you need a policy solution,” Kurland told the Georgia Straight. “Logic is not a high priority on this bill.”

      Under Bill C-45, tabled by Minister of Citizenship, Immigration and Multiculturalism Jason Kenney on June 17, a visa officer “shall refuse to authorize the foreign national to work in Canada if, in the officer’s opinion, public policy considerations that are specified in the instructions given by the Minister justify such a refusal”.

      The instructions, according to the bill, “shall prescribe public policy considerations that aim to protect foreign nationals who are at risk of being subjected to humiliating or degrading treatment, including sexual exploitation”.

      Kenney’s ministry issued a media release stating that the proposed amendments to the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act will “protect vulnerable foreign workers such as exotic dancers and live-in caregivers who could be victims of exploitation”.

      However, Kurland said that bill is a “blank cheque to refuse people”.

      “The path that I see is.”¦”˜Let’s attack exotic dancers because we want to but we’re not allowed to,’ ” he said, adding that exotic dancing in strip clubs is a legal activity. “They can’t use the criminal law so they’re going to use the immigration law on a morality issue.”

      Alice Wong, Conservative MP for Richmond and parliamentary secretary for multiculturalism, explained that the bill is intended more for exotic dancers, agricultural labourers, and those who may end up in “sweat shops” than it is for live-in caregivers.

      According to Wong, one measure to evaluate the vulnerability of a person is insufficiency of funds. “If we allow them in, we are actually putting them in great risk,” Wong told the Straight.

      Wong confirmed that the bill is driven by Conservatives’ aversion to foreign strippers in Canada. “That is one of the major concerns because, legally, according to admissible criteria, these workers can come in but experience has told us that once they come in, they will be exploited,” she said.

      Erika Del Carmen Fuchs of the Justicia for Migrant Workers B.C. doesn’t agree with the Conservative approach. Fuchs told the Straight: “If there’s a problem with human trafficking, they should go after traffickers, not the people being trafficked.”

      In May, two Filipino caregivers alleged mistreatment by Liberal MP Ruby Dhalla’s family. The caregivers claimed that they worked 12 to 16 hours a day and that their passports were confiscated. If the bill becomes law and is applied to cases similar to the Dhalla affair, Kurland said that the only remedy available for caregivers would be to get kicked out of Canada.

      “The only way I see them helping people is to say, ”˜We’re going to help you by not letting you come here,’ ” Kurland said.

      Strip club owners already find it almost impossible to bring women to Canada. In a letter to Parliament’s citizenship and immigration committee in 2008, Tim Lambrinos, executive director of the Adult Entertainment Association of Canada, pointed out that from about 1,000 visas for strippers issued in an unspecified previous year, the government issued only 17 in 2007 and half of 2006 combined.

      In a phone interview from Toronto, Lambrinos said that in 2008, only about 10 visas for foreign strippers were granted.

      “I want to know the name of one Canadian employer, of an exotic club owner who has been charged or convicted of any crime of any form of exploitation against foreign women working as an exotic dancer in Canada in the last five years,” Lambrinos told the Straight. “There’s not one.”

      In 2008, 192,519 temporary foreign workers were admitted to Canada. On the day the Conservatives tabled Bill C-45, Liberal MP Joyce Murray sought unanimous consent on her motion for a plan to address human trafficking and sexual exploitation of vulnerable persons. According to Murray, all parties supported the motion except the Conservatives.

      “This is a poor excuse for addressing human trafficking,” Murray told the Straight, in reference to the bill.

      The Multicultural Helping House Society will host a conference for caregivers at the St. Mary’s Ukrainian Catholic Centre at 3150 Ash Street in Vancouver on July 18. According to the group’s programs director, Maria Javier, Bill C-45 will give too much discretionary powers to visa officers in Canadian embassies.

      Comments

      1 Comments

      Kathleen Herbison

      Jul 5, 2009 at 1:30pm

      Those who profit from the sexual exploitation of women and those who seek out these exploitative services need to be targeted in Canadian law enforcement - not foreign workers. The Conservative Government's time would be better spent finding ways to protect foreign women coming into this country - women who often make the move to Canada in an attempt to escape sexist violence back home. Why is it that women immigrating to Canada are often given the limited choice to work in homecare or in the sex industry? The answer lies in the institutionalized racism and patriarchical structure of Canadian law and society. Only if the Conservatives choose to accept this FACT can they hope to "protect vulnerable foreign workers".