Vancouver and Burnaby school districts expect funding cuts

    1 of 2 2 of 2

      Premier-designate Christy Clark’s pledge to put B.C. families first on her agenda will be put to the test soon.

      According to Patti Bacchus and Larry Hayes, chairs of the Vancouver and Burnaby school boards, respectively, that opportunity will come when the Ministry of Education announces in mid March the funding allocations for the 60 school districts across the province.

      Vancouver and Burnaby are anticipating budget shortfalls for fiscal year 2011–12. Like a number of school districts in B.C., in previous years they had to reduce services in order to balance their budgets, as required by provincial legislation.

      “But we certainly hope that with a new [government] leader, they’ll take a closer look,” Bacchus told the Georgia Straight in a phone interview. “If there’s a commitment to putting families first, one of the best ways of doing that is to ensure that all students and all children have access to education programs that fully meet their needs.”

      Ninety-five percent of the Vancouver school board’s annual budget of about $500 million comes from provincial grants.

      For the next school year, which starts in September, Bacchus said that the cost of delivering the same programs and services as in the current year will increase by $11.8 million. Without a corresponding increase in provincial funding, the board will have to cut expenditures by the same amount.

      For the current year’s budget, the board had to reduce a number of services to make up for a $17.2-million shortfall.

      An information paper released by the Vancouver school board explains why education districts in B.C. face chronic budget problems.

      “The reason for chronic underfunding is clear: a per-student funding formula introduced in 2002/2003 that does not fund cost increases regularly faced by districts, nor fixed costs that remain constant with small changes in enrolment,” the document said.

      These costs include salary adjustments, the increasing cost of employee benefits, inflation costs, and other facility and district-administration expenses.

      Clark served as education minister from 2001 to 2004, and Burnaby’s Hayes, a three-term school trustee, isn’t impressed by her track record.

      “There didn’t seem to be a lot of willingness on the government’s part, and on the minister, Ms. Clark’s, part at the time, to engage in any positive conversation in looking towards solutions to things,” Hayes told the Straight in a phone interview. “So it’s certainly nice to hear some of what’s being said, what some of her sound bites are now. But I think there’s probably a general concern based on what we’ve seen in the past. Hopefully, we see a positive change.”

      According to Hayes, the Burnaby school board is anticipating a budget shortfall of $4 million to $5 million for the next school year. For 2010–11, the board had to spread cuts totalling about $4 million across its programs.

      Education Minister Margaret MacDiarmid didn’t grant a request for an interview before deadline.

      According to the status quo provincial budget unveiled last month by Finance Minister Colin Hansen, operations funding for school districts will remain constant at $4.7 billion. It is generally understood that the B.C. budget released in February will be revised once a new government leader takes over.

      A news release from the Finance Ministry states that per-student funding in the K-12 levels is “estimated to increase to $8,357 for 2011-12, the highest ever”.

      “The government spends over $24 million per school day on education programs and services to support B.C. students across the province,” the ministry statement reads.

      Because of funding problems it was facing, the Vancouver school board last year identified 11 schools that may be considered for closure. The list was later pared down to five elementary schools. Following protests, mainly by parents and children, the board adopted a moratorium on proceeding with any school closures until March 1, 2012.

      When the Straight reached Bacchus on February 28, she admitted that she had gotten a number of calls that day asking whether or not she would challenge Clark for a seat in the legislature if the newly elected B.C. Liberal leader decided to run in a by-election in Vancouver–Point Grey.

      Outgoing premier Gordon Campbell has indicated that he will give up his Vancouver–Point Grey seat if Clark wants it.

      “I wasn’t really planning to do that, but there does seem to be some level of interest in at least my considering the option,” Bacchus said. She says she hasn’t made a decision yet.

      Comments

      15 Comments

      monty/that's me

      Mar 3, 2011 at 7:49am

      "Families first" is a joke. This person could not keep her own family together. She voiced a Mummy show on NW and fooled some folk. She did not graduate from SFU or complete the course work overseas. The depth of her intelligence is minimal. How come the writers are mentioning a bunch of men who are part of her team without mentioning Patrick Kinsella the BIG KAHUNA behind this charade.

      Kathleen M Pickard

      Mar 3, 2011 at 9:00am

      Christy's pledge has been greater support for private and religious schools so it seems likely there will be cuts to many public schools.
      Given her professed interest in families and education it will be really interesting to see what she does with Bountiful.

      Lindsay Dianne

      Mar 3, 2011 at 9:52am

      I'll believe it when I see it. The liberals are not known for their commitment to education. There's no money for them in that.

      Do I sound like a cynic?

      DJBALL

      Mar 3, 2011 at 10:06am

      Christy's lights look on but i don't think anyone is home.

      NoLeftNutter

      Mar 3, 2011 at 11:25am

      Putting families first has nothing to do with trying to meet the never-ending demands of school boards. Per student funding amounts continue to increase while enrollment declines. Stop pandering to every demand and whim at the school board level and join the rest of us in the real world and do more with less.

      kitsfamily

      Mar 3, 2011 at 12:24pm

      My son attends Kits High School and there isn't enough text books in his Science or Math class ... I am unsure any more of this province and priorities, We build a roof for BC Place, we build an Olympic Village, put in Bike Lanes but our High Schools don't have text books and St. Pauls Hospital is falling apart... VERY SAD as children are our future

      RickW

      Mar 3, 2011 at 3:34pm

      NoLeftNutter:

      The government itself doesn't know what "do more with less" means. Why do you expect school boards (and the rest of us) to do what government says, and not what government does?
      RickW

      NoLeftNutter

      Mar 3, 2011 at 4:15pm

      RickW,
      This dialogue may be a little too sophisticated for you...the school boards are simply another level of government. And I want them all to spend less money so I can keep more of my productivity for myself.

      Steve Y

      Mar 3, 2011 at 8:18pm

      The problem is the overpaid teachers are sucking the system dry. Notice how they portray THE HIGHEST PER STUDENT FUNDING EVER as a cut. Why is the most money ever per student a cut? Why because teachers who would otherwise be working at starbucks have to be paid over 100K per year including benefits for 8 months a year of work.

      RickW

      Mar 4, 2011 at 7:49am

      NoLeftNutter:
      Perhaps you aren't as "productive" as you think you are. Your Fraser Institute has told you as much, and many times. Perhaps if you were more productive, Big Brother wouldn't tax you near as much as you think it does.
      Steve Y:
      Who are you to say what someone else should make? Where (for instance) is your complaint about how much politicians make? Where is your complaint about how much average CEO salaries are?
      RickW