COVID-19: The pandemic has exposed our devaluation of the lives of seniors and those with dementia

    1 of 1 2 of 1

      By Sube Banerjee and Carole Estabrooks

      Everything seemed to have changed in dementia care. It had become a policy priority and public and professional attitudes and understanding were improving, as were services and care. And then COVID-19 happened—a profound shock to the system that showed that underneath, especially for the particularly vulnerable population living in long-term care homes, little had really changed.

      Seventy percent of all COVID-19 deaths in Canada have been in long-term care home residents, with a similar pattern worldwide. This carnage has happened because, as a society, we have valued older people in general—and people with dementia, in particular—less than other people.

      There are more than 50 million people worldwide who have dementia; by 2050, that will increase to 150 million. Dementia already costs Canada over $12 billion a year; worldwide, the costs are more than a trillion dollars per year. Much of that money is spent on long-term care for the elderly in high-income countries such as Canada and the U.K.

      What is less well known is that about 85 percent of the people who live in care homes have some form of cognitive impairment, and 70 percent have dementia. 

      Nursing-home care is essentially long-term care for people with dementia. We’ve sacrificed them during this pandemic. 

      In the past decade, things had changed dramatically for people with dementia. Through the fantastic work of nonprofit organizations like the Alzheimer’s Society, the real problems with the treatment and care of people with dementia and their families became clear.

      Starting in the U.K. and France, and including Canada, national dementia strategies were formulated that accepted dementia as a priority. Things started changing for the better. As a result of lobbying and research, diagnostic and care services were developed, diagnosis rates started to increase, and the quality of care started to improve, from diagnosis through to end of life.

      There was amazing public creativity from the formation of dementia cafes to singing for the brain. The public-awareness campaign Dementia Friends reached more than 20 million people worldwide across 56 countries, driving an increased understanding of dementia.

      But then COVID-19 hit. The pandemic made clear that little had changed in the priorities and fundamental values, attitudes, and beliefs of the health system, of politicians, and even of well-meaning, hard-pressed practitioners on the frontline faced with making difficult decisions.

      Pressure on general hospitals was managed at the cost of the lives of thousands of older people dying in care homes. We valued care homes less than general hospitals by conscious and unconscious discrimination.

      Care homes were last in line for PPE; they were last in line for testing. They were told not to send their residents to hospitals and to accept ill and sometimes untested people back from hospitals to clear hospital beds for other, apparently more deserving, cases.

      Lives of old and frail worth less than those of young and fit

      The Elizabethan Poor Law of the late-16th century created the concept of the deserving poor, whose needs should be met, and the undeserving poor, whose needs could be ignored. In our second Elizabethan age, presented with the COVID crisis, we reverted reflexively to a mindset of discrimination against older adults and people with dementia and created a class of the “undeserving ill”.

      The undeserving ill could be denied treatment, not only for COVID-19 but for other conditions that required hospital care. The undeserving ill could be turned away from hospitals because they had dementia or because they lived in care homes. This has happened because how we value people has not changed, because underlying beliefs and attitudes have not changed.

      In this crisis, behaviour reverted to a largely unthinking belief system where the lives of old and frail people are worth less than those who are young and fit. Care homes and their residents were used as a human shield to protect the rest of the health system, governments, and society.

      They died to protect us.

      This cannot be the end of the story. We must learn from this. We can change the way we organize and deliver long-term care. All developed countries, Canada included, have the resources to do things better if we choose to act to change the way we value people with dementia and those that live in care homes.

      The vaccines being rolled out are a ray of light in a dark time, and they will, in time, return things back to normal. But they will not address the underlying faults in the system.

      COVID-19 has shown us that the normal is not good enough for those living in care homes. Our values and our actions need to change. We need to use the ultimate sacrifice made by older people in this crisis to put providing great-quality care for people with dementia at the top of the political agenda.

      Carole Estabrooks is scientific director of the pan-Canadian Translating Research in Elder Care (TREC) program and professor and Canada Research Chair, faculty of nursing, at the University of Alberta. Sube Banerjee is a senior geriatric psychiatrist and executive dean and professor of dementia in the faculty of health at the University of Plymouth, U.K.