Parents divided over Wi-Fi safety in Lower Mainland schools

    1 of 1 2 of 1

      John Puddifoot knows there are clear divisions among parents when it comes to the issue of installing wireless Internet systems in schools.

      “There are a number of parents that are very strongly of the opinion that it should be banned from all schools,” the chair of the Wi-Fi subcommittee for the B.C. Confederation of Parent Advisory Councils told the Georgia Straight over the phone. “There are also a number of parents that are of the opinion that this is absolute poppycock and there is nothing wrong with it.

      “If you sit in the middle, they try and convert you,” Puddifoot added. “It’s very religious, so to speak, in its approach.”

      Debate over Wi-Fi safety at BCCPAC is so vigorous that, according to Puddifoot, the organization hasn’t been able to decide what its official position is on whether or not this technology should be installed in British Columbia’s classrooms.

      “I am in the middle. There is certainly evidence that tells me that there may be some risk,” said Puddifoot, who is the father of two students in the Vancouver school district. “But Wi-Fi, especially in Vancouver, is literally everywhere. So, you can’t control it. And even if you were to ban it, you would still be getting it.”

      The Ontario English Catholic Teachers Association believes wireless Internet should no longer be installed in schools because of health concerns. The union that represents 45,000 teachers says more research needs to be done to prove Wi-Fi exposure is safe.

      The World Health Organization is still reviewing the possible dangers of Wi-Fi exposure. So far, findings by the WHO’s International Agency for Research on Cancer classify radio-frequency electromagnetic fields from mobile phones, along with coffee, nickel, and Asian pickled vegetables, as “possibly carcinogenic to humans”.

      “There is a lot of research over the past 30 years that has gone into cellphones and Wi-Fi and other types of electromagnetic frequencies, as we dub them, but probably a small amount of that research has gone into looking at the effects of it on children,” Claire Cohalan, a radiation scientist with the Radiation Safety Institute of Canada, told the Straight over the phone from Toronto. “Whether we are talking about kids or adults, there is no physical reason to think that things like cancer would come about from those types of radiation.

      “The scientific community is a little split on it, but in western Europe and North America there has been something like 25,000 papers that have been published on this, and most of the scientific population says there is no problem,” Cohalan added.

      Cohalan says she understands the concerns of some parents, and concedes that more research looking into the long-term effects of such electromagnetic radiation needs to be done.

      “I don’t think we should stop Wi-Fi,” Cohalan said. “We have been around these electromagnetic fields for a very long time, and there is no reason to believe that they have adverse health effects.”

      Most school districts in the Lower Mainland have already installed Wi-Fi networks in their schools. However, in New Westminster, the school board has decided to hold off on such plans until more information is available on the potential dangers associated with these low-level electromagnetic fields.

      “We’ve been getting calls from parents expressing concerns,” assistant superintendent Al Balanuik told the Straight over the phone.

      “It’s all about gathering information and making informed decisions,” added Balanuik, who says that by the end of the year the district will have a draft of a technology plan that will address installing Wi-Fi networks.

      In Surrey, the school board has allocated funding to have wireless Internet installed at a majority of its schools over the next two years.

      “We were putting in those funny dial-up lines in the ’90s, and to see where we are now is quite a transformation,” Dan Turner, the Surrey school district’s director of information management services, told the Straight by phone.

      Turner says the district has taken advantage of features on Wi-Fi stations to limit the amount of radiation in schools. Access points in the schools are designed to adjust their transmission power when they are not being used.

      “It pays attention to what is going on in the room,” Turner explained. “This particular system works to limit the amount of transmitting when it is not necessary.

      “It’s an intelligence built into the system for power consumption,” he added, “and we communicate it that these access points are not transmitting all the time.”

      Still, until the World Health Organization releases its latest study on Wi-Fi later this year, Puddifoot says parents will remain divided on whether it’s safe in the classroom.

      “Until there is sound scientific evidence one way or another, you are going to still find people on both sides of the issue and [who] feel very strongly on both sides of the issue,” Puddifoot said. “It’s one of those issues that is divisive, and it is difficult to deal with because both sides believe deep down they are right.”

      Comments

      7 Comments

      EMF Lorax

      Mar 7, 2012 at 5:35pm

      I was at a presentation at a Surrey School where Mr. Turner was several weeks ago. I explained at this meeting Wi-Fi uses a beacon signal, separate from the data strem to broadcast the name of the Wi-Fi network - this is how everyone connects to networks that appear in a list when you flip on your computer or device's Wi-Fi function. This beacon signal is at full power 7x24 - it cannot modulate it's power otherwise those on the periphery of the access point range would not be able to connect - if the access point is rated for 300 feet, the beacon signal must reach 300 feet. Mr Turner is referring to the data stream only modulating it's power - the data stream is what actually transmits the data - videos, emails. etc.

      A former Wi-Fi industry insider who has gotten ill from Wi-Fi has confirmed that it's the beacon that does the most damage.

      Google "BECTA Wi-fi Report Suppressed". In the late '90's the British engineers that were testing the first Wi-Fi systems all had headaches at the end of the day. There was a report which has never seen the light of day. Wi-Fi and cell phones have NEVER been pre-tested for safety and there is no monitoring going on for health effects!

      john adams

      Mar 8, 2012 at 1:17pm

      what a stupid line of thought- because it is everywhere, we shouldn't control it in schools. Okay, so smoking was once everywhere, so that means it is okay to smoke in schools? Shouldn't schools be held to a higher standard of care than Starbucks? Microwave RF is same risk category as DDT, chloroform, dioxane, and more. How about we just spray a little bit of DDT every day around the school - chemicals are everywhere, so there is no reason to keep the school safe from them, right?

      john adams

      Mar 8, 2012 at 1:20pm

      And what about that statement ' ...certainly evidence there is some risk" -= helloooo!!!! No insurance agency covers for personal health and liability re wireless device exposure any more - that means the school districts are self insured in an area of identified risk, aka possible human cancer risk. Hell hath no fury as parents whose kids are sickened by a technology forced upon them. And no insurance to cover the risk. Another stupidity.

      Bye WiFi

      Mar 8, 2012 at 3:14pm

      I've been investigating the science on this issue. There are many studies that show adverse biological effects from RF microwave radiation, such as is emitted from WiFi. These have found double strand DNA damage, leakage of the blood brain barrier, increased risk of cancer, and many other issues.

      There is too much money being made from this technology for all the science to agree, but 70% of the independently funded science finds effects. That's more than enough to justify the removal of WiFi from schools.

      wired is safer

      Mar 8, 2012 at 4:41pm

      Watch Wifi in Schools is Safe - True or False? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6v75sKAUFdc and you wouldn't want schools taking legal and parental liability for a class 2b carcinogen. Actually, when in history have schools ever proceeded to impose class 2b carcinogens on our youngest and most vulnerable populations? Children have thinner skulls and rapidly developing bodies and are not little adults! Schools are setting themselves up for class action lawsuits with girls not able to ovulate along with heart monitors for racing hearts. How much is all of that going to cost taxpayers? Will all the kickbacks from wireless industry to the school system be worth it? Wouldn't it make sense to simply place wired internet access for schools and avoid microwave radiofrequency radiation in the first place?

      health4life

      Mar 8, 2012 at 5:45pm

      No school has obtained the expressed consent from parents to risk their childrens' lives to a known human carcinogen nearly everyday for many years. Face it, school districts cannot afford to bury their heads in the sand on this one. There is too much at stake. You know the risk is great when insurance companies will no longer cover health damages from your product- hello? Education is already bankrupt- don't make it much worse by harming innocent children at the most vulnerable time of their lives- and worse- knowingly.

      EMF Lorax

      Mar 9, 2012 at 10:21am

      Watch how Wi-Fi affects the heart - this is exactly what was happening with a few children in Ontario when Global TV did this investigative report::

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x-OW572Y2CI