Jack Chivo: Death of Yasser Arafat should be explained more completely

    1 of 2 2 of 2

      For about a week, the world media and political pundits are abuzz with a story originating from the Arab media organization, Al Jazeera.

      The network has claimed that late Palestine Liberation Organization leader Yasser Arafat, who died eight years ago, had high-level traces of the lethal polonium 210 in some of his clothing, including his underwear, faithfully kept by his widow, Suha Arafat.

      Immediately, conspiracy theorists, including some who might comment below this op-ed, started pointing fingers in a few directions.

      In my opinion the question should be "what killed Arafat", rather than "who killed" him , because there is no proof whatsoever that the late terrorist leader was assassinated, and he probably died of a still undisclosed illness. Which is quite in line with what happened eight years ago, when he spend his last weeks in a famous French hospital, where he was under the care of some of the leading French physicians and specialists. No one at the facility ever suggested at the time that his death was foul play.

      Strangely, nobody, including Al Jazeera, seems to have read the website of IAEA (International Atomic Energy Agency) and other scientific papers, where this element, in its 210 form, is described as "fairly volatile" with a "half-life"—the time frame when it is active—of only 138 days.

      During these four-and-a-half months, polonium 210 is undergoing an "exponential radioactive decay", after which its efficiency is increasingly diminished, soon reaching the level of zero.

      In layman terms, it is like the "shelf life", or expiry date, of a medication or different chemicals, after which point they are no longer effective.

      This draws the conclusion that either the findings were faulty, or there was a recent and unexplained contamination of Arafat's clothing, which has always bee in possession of his widow Suha.

      In any case, the assumption that after eight long years, high levels of radioactive polonium 210 would have still been present, as alleged by Al Jazeera, is beyond ridiculous, and would result in an "F" grade for any high-school student making the same imprudent claim.

      All of this leaves us with the question: what killed Arafat?

      To start with, he was already over 75, a ripe age for people from his area and one who hadn't been in good health for a long time. He lived on the "run" for most of his adult life.

      But there are other elements worth considering, including the fact that his widow, Suha, has steadfastly refused since his death to release his medical records, or to have a full autopsy performed at the French hospital.This has triggered lots of rumours, which could have been easily put to rest if his grieving widow would have released the findings.

      In the meantime Suha Arafat, has become one of the richest women in the Middle East, with an estimated wealth of over $1 billion stashed in different bank accounts. There are mansions in many countries, of course staffed with personnel and bodyguards, including in France, Switzerland, Malta and for a while, and Tunisia, where she was a citizen, until being stripped of this a few years ago.

      Late last year, after the "Arab Spring", the Tunisian government issued an international warrant for the arrest of Suha Arafat, accusing her of corruption.

      Even the recent calls to exhume his body buried in Ramallah—this could have been ordered immediately if there was a real concern to find the truth. The widow along with the Palestinian Authority controlling the area would have acquiesced. But these calls have been followed so far by no concrete actions from the parties involved, which is not a positive sign.

      The most consistent allegations are about Arafat's life style, which was revealed in details in many writings, including the once sensational book, Red Horizons, written by the former chief spy of the Communist regime in Romania, two-star general Ioan Pacepa. He describes over a number of pages the regular visits by the late PLO leader to Nicolae Ceausescu's palaces. He reveals that following Ceausescu's direct orders, hidden microphones in Arafat's room had recorded wild and steamy encounters between the PLO leader and some of his very young male companions he was bringing along, describing him in not too complementary words.

      The book is still available at some local public libraries and this particular excerpt can be found online. Of course, I do not know the truth, but I would love to find out.

      Hopefully, Suha Arafat and the Palestinian Authority will stop dragging their feet and allow the hospital to finally release the medical records along with a full and comprehensive test of Arafat's remains, under the supervision of a recognized international forensic medical team.

      Unfortunately, I have the feeling that will not happen.

      Jack Chivo is a retired journalist who lives in West Vancouver.

      Comments

      6 Comments

      Sheeple

      Jul 8, 2012 at 2:37pm

      Who cares how he died or what he died of?

      By the way you seem to highlight his alleged Homosexuality.

      Are you Homophobic? Are you against Homosexuality Chivo?

      You can always count on Chivo for the Pro-Israel Anti Arab/Palestinian Articles.

      How old are you Jack? Getting close to his age? :)

      Mr Science

      Jul 8, 2012 at 5:52pm

      You're totally wrong about what a half-life is. It's not a shelf life, it's the amount of time for half the radioactive material to decay. Every 138 days, the amount of Plutonium 210 gets cut in half. So if you start out with 10 grams, after 138 days you'll have 5 grams, and then 138 days after that, you'll have 2.5 grams, and then 138 days after that, you'll have 1.25 grams, etc etc.

      It never decays to zero. It just gets smaller and smaller. So after 8 years, there will still be a tiny amount present - perhaps a millionth of the original quantity. But since it's so highly radioactive, it's still detectable.

      Perhaps you should do a bit more research before ranting off at reputable news organizations like Al Jazeera.

      Jack Chivo

      Jul 8, 2012 at 9:20pm

      I am just wondering whether the first two comments are meant to besmirch the writer, rather than addresing the issue.

      Arafat died eight years ago, and his widow along with his PLO partners have waited for so long without permitting the release of the medical files, or a full autopsy, for their own reasons.

      I think one should wonder why?

      As for the alleged Mr. Science, who hides his name, the Swiss report, if he read it, concluded that there was an "abnormaly high concentration of Plutonium 210" in the clothing, not a "milionth of the original quantity".

      Who put it there when and why????

      And as a scientist, allegedely knowing your stuff, you should also wonder about another mystery. One of the first signs of poisoning with Polonium 210 is total loss of body hair, which happens in the first two-three days, as it was the case with the killing of former KGB agent, Litvinenko. You can google the pictures,

      He was a younger, fit, well trained officer, unlike Arafat, and after a few days he was bald and lost all his body hair.This was the sign the doctors in London saw, triggering their interest to investigate a possible radioactive poisoning.

      Then look at the pictures of Arafat arriving in Paris with a full beard, which is seen growing in his hospital bed, for a number of days, until his with Suha on his side. In his last photos, the beard is still clearly visible.

      No patient with radioactive poisoning has ever been seen with his beard or other hair, growing!!

      As for the exhumation, don't keep your breath!!

      Abbas wants permission from Arafat's nephew, who has immediately refused it. Their PM requested an inter-Arab commission to "study the matter", before opening the coffin.

      The Tunisians also want to be involved, requiring diplomatic negotiations.

      The way it looks, they will study the matter to death, but will not release the remains to the Swiss lab. Because they might be aware what the results will be.

      I did not know what killed Arafat and I did not care. I only reported what I read in the world media.

      But now I am curious.

      And so should you be!

      Sheeple

      Jul 9, 2012 at 6:28pm

      So are you against Homosexuality? :)

      Jack Chivo

      Jul 9, 2012 at 10:02pm

      To Sheeple, who seems not to have any original ideas, only "fixed ideas"!

      NO, I have nothing against Homosexuality!!

      Do you??

      cuz

      Jul 10, 2012 at 11:37am

      Why does Arafat's wife have millions of dollars stashed in accounts around the world??? Did they skim that money from the aid sent to the PLO???